These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30602307)

  • 1. Reliability of Americleft Yardstick Nasolabial Appearance Assessment With/Without Basal View for Japanese Children With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Amir MS; Fuchigami T; Kibe T; Tezuka M; Ishihata K; Nakamura N
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Aug; 56(7):953-959. PubMed ID: 30602307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Americleft Project: A Proposed Expanded Nasolabial Appearance Yardstick for 5- to 7-Year-Old Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (CUCLP).
    Mercado AM; Russell KA; Daskalogiannakis J; Hathaway RR; Semb G; Ozawa T; Smith A; Lin AY; Long RE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 25844562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Americleft Project: A Modification of Asher-McDade Method for Rating Nasolabial Esthetics in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Q-sort.
    Stoutland A; Long RE; Mercado A; Daskalogiannakis J; Hathaway RR; Russell KA; Singer E; Semb G; Shaw WC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 28906328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 4. Nasolabial aesthetics.
    Mercado A; Russell K; Hathaway R; Daskalogiannakis J; Sadek H; Long RE; Cohen M; Semb G; Shaw W
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 May; 48(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 21219227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Americleft Project: Comparison of Ratings Using Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Images for Evaluation of Nasolabial Appearance in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Jones CM; Roth B; Mercado AM; Russell KA; Daskalogiannakis J; Samson TD; Hathaway RR; Smith A; Mackay DR; Long RE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):105-108. PubMed ID: 29286995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale for 18-Year-Old Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Tool for Nasolabial Aesthetics Assessment.
    Mulder FJ; Mosmuller DGM; de Vet HCW; Mouës CM; Breugem CC; van der Molen ABM; Don Griot JPW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Aug; 55(7):1006-1012. PubMed ID: 27996297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rating nasolabial appearance on three-dimensional images in cleft lip and palate: a comparison with standard photographs.
    Stebel A; Desmedt D; Bronkhorst E; Kuijpers MA; Fudalej PS
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 25900054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rating Nasolabial Aesthetics in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Cropped Versus Full-Face Images.
    Schwirtz RMF; Mulder FJ; Mosmuller DGM; Tan RA; Maal TJ; Prahl C; de Vet HCW; Don Griot JPW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 May; 55(5):747-752. PubMed ID: 29350971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nasolabial aesthetics of patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: A comparison of three rating methods in two countries.
    Nguyen VT; Nguyen T; Jagomägi T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 46(8):1385-1389. PubMed ID: 29861405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Development of the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale: A New Rating Scale for the Assessment of Nasolabial Appearance in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
    Mosmuller DGM; Mennes LM; Prahl C; Kramer GJC; Disse MA; van Couwelaar GM; Niessen FB; Griot JPWD
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Sep; 54(5):555-561. PubMed ID: 27537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reference photographs for nasolabial appearance rating in unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Nollet PJ; Semb G; Bronkhorst EM; Shaw WC; Katsaros C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1683-6. PubMed ID: 19816333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Intercenter Comparison of Nasolabial Appearance Including a Center Using Nasoalveolar Molding.
    Peanchitlertkajorn S; Mercado A; Daskalogiannakis J; Hathaway R; Russell K; Semb G; Shaw W; Lamichane M; Cohen M; Long RE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 May; 55(5):655-663. PubMed ID: 29446986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nasolabial symmetry and aesthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Fudalej P; Katsaros C; Hozyasz K; Borstlap WA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 50(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 22245268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Basal View Reference Photographs for Nasolabial Appearance Rating in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Rubin MS; Lowe KM; Clouston S; Shetye PR; Warren SM; Grayson BH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 26(5):1548-50. PubMed ID: 26163840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nasolabial appearance after two palatoplasty types in cleft lip and palate.
    Brudnicki A; Bronkhorst EM; Nada R; Dudkiewicz Z; Kaminek M; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 May; 17(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 24417872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two scoring systems in the assessment of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients.
    Mosmuller DG; Bijnen CL; Don Griot JP; Kramer GJ; Disse MA; Prahl C; Kuik DJ; Niessen FB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1222-5. PubMed ID: 24978682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: A comparison of aesthetics using two scoring systems: A cross-sectional study.
    Talwar A; Duggal I; Duggal R; Chaudhari PK; Samrit V
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Feb; 26(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 35362657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nasolabial Aesthetics Following Cleft Repair: An Objective Evaluation of Subjective Assessment.
    Kantar RS; Maliha SG; Alfonso AR; Wang MM; Ramly EP; Eisemann BS; Shetye PR; Grayson BH; Flores RL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Oct; 56(9):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 31117813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Longitudinal Investigation of Nasolabial Changes With and Without Revision Surgery in Patients with Non-Syndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Dabbagh W; Groff D; Stauffer L; Newland M; Lo A; Hiller A; Long RE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2024 May; ():10556656241256706. PubMed ID: 38813767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Three Methods of Rating Nasolabial Appearance in Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Fudalej SA; Desmedt D; Bronkhorst E; Fudalej PS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jul; 54(4):400-407. PubMed ID: 28140671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.