These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30602643)

  • 1. Evaluation of Stress Distribution Among Two Different Pre-angled Abutments of Implants in Two Different Densities of Bone at Different Levels Along the Implant-/n Vitro Study.
    Singh NK; Chalapathy SB; Thota RP; Chakravarthula K; Tirnati R; Yenugupalli K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 30602643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Implant-Abutment Connection and Abutment Angulations on Peri-implant Stress Levels: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Khatib I; Joshi NV; Rao P; Joshi M; Shetty A; Thorat V; Talreja P
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2024; 45(7):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 39029968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Pattern Analysis in Bone around Implant-supported Abutment with Different Angulations under Axial and Oblique Load.
    Uppalapati V; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Bhat I; Munaganti J; Khan S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 37189007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
    de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Associated With Different Implant Designs for Different Bone Densities.
    Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş I; Kilic K; Bal B; Kilavuz A
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Aug; 31(7):614-622. PubMed ID: 35603892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of stress distribution in bone of different densities using different implant designs: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Premnath K; Sridevi J; Kalavathy N; Nagaranjani P; Sharmila MR
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Dec; 13(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 24431792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
    Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution around implant with straight and angled abutments in different bone qualities.
    Arun Kumar G; Mahesh B; George D
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Dec; 13(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 24431777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of the Type of Angled Abutment for Anterior Maxillary Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Korkmaz IH; Kul E
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Oct; 31(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 34859942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study.
    Saab XE; Griggs JA; Powers JM; Engelmeier RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 17341376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Platform Switched and Sloping Shoulder Implants on Stress Reduction in various Bone Densities: Finite Element Analysis.
    Markose J; Suresh S; Eshwar S; Rekha K; Jain V; Manvi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 18(6):510-515. PubMed ID: 28621284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Effect of Connector Designs in Implant Tooth-supported Fixed Partial Denture: A Two-dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Gowda S; Quadras DD; Sesappa RS; Katapadi V; Kumar L; Kulkarni D; Mishra N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):669-674. PubMed ID: 29959294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of Stress Distribution on the Bone around an Implant Placed in the Anterior Maxilla Using Three Different Abutment Angulations by Means of Finite Element Analysis.
    Shende S; Jadhav A; Edake DN; Patil AH; Patil H; Agrawal N
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Nov; 13(Suppl 2):S1591-S1596. PubMed ID: 35018036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
    Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Angled abutments result in increased or decreased stress on surrounding bone of single-unit dental implants: a finite element analysis.
    Tian K; Chen J; Han L; Yang J; Huang W; Wu D
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Dec; 34(10):1526-31. PubMed ID: 23122601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.