These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30602645)

  • 1. To Assess and Evaluate the Variation of Mandibular Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Before Planning an Implant Surgery: A Population-based Retrospective Study.
    Kapoor V; Kumar N; Dahiya K; Sikka R; Sirana P; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 30602645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles.
    Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
    Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
    J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
    Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.
    de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL
    Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between CBCT and panoramic images of the morphology and angulation of the posterior mandibular jaw bone.
    Çiftçi ME; Aktan AM; İşman Ö; Yıldırım E
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2016 Apr; 38(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 26370261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Relevance of the Use of Radiographic Planning in Order to Avoid Complications in Mandibular Implantology: A Retrospective Study.
    Sammartino G; Prados-Frutos JC; Riccitiello F; Felice P; Cerone V; Gasparro R; Wang HL
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():8175284. PubMed ID: 27294136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study.
    Orhan K; Aksoy S; Bilecenoglu B; Sakul BU; Paksoy CS
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2011 Aug; 33(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 21161224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of implant placement in healed mandibular molar sites: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study.
    He J; Liu Y; Lin Z; Li Y; Li C; Zhou L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):904.e1-904.e10. PubMed ID: 38472073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before-after study.
    Shelley AM; Ferrero A; Brunton P; Goodwin M; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140316. PubMed ID: 25472617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in Location of the Mandibular Foramen/Inferior Alveolar Nerve Complex Given Anatomic Landmarks Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scans.
    Blacher J; Van DaHuvel S; Parashar V; Mitchell JC
    J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 26786380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of scan mode (180°/360°) of the cone beam computed tomography for preoperative dental implant measurements.
    Neves FS; Vasconcelos TV; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e155-8. PubMed ID: 23231370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography.
    Uchida Y; Noguchi N; Goto M; Yamashita Y; Hanihara T; Takamori H; Sato I; Kawai T; Yosue T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 19304029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between ridge morphology and complexity of implant placement planning in the posterior mandible.
    Tözüm MD; Ataman-Duruel ET; Duruel O; Nares S; Tözüm TF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):361-367. PubMed ID: 33593676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the morphological changes in the mandible for dentate and totally edentate elderly population using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Tozoğlu U; Cakur B
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2014 Sep; 36(7):643-9. PubMed ID: 24292424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.