155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30603624)
1. A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Na ER; Aljawad H; Lee KM; Hwang HS
Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30603624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of lateral cephalogram during landmark identification on posteroanterior cephalograms.
Hwang SA; Lee JS; Hwang HS; Lee KM
Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 30603623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a multi-stage convolutional neural network-based fully automated landmark identification system using cone-beam computed tomographysynthesized posteroanterior cephalometric images.
Kim MJ; Liu Y; Oh SH; Ahn HW; Kim SH; Nelson G
Korean J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 51(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 33678623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.
Shokri A; Miresmaeili A; Farhadian N; Falah-Kooshki S; Amini P; Mollaie N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160180. PubMed ID: 28306330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of posteroanterior cephalogram landmarks and measurements identification using a cascaded convolutional neural network algorithm: A multicenter study.
Han SH; Lim J; Kim JS; Cho JH; Hong M; Kim M; Kim SJ; Kim YJ; Kim YH; Lim SH; Sung SJ; Kang KH; Baek SH; Choi SK; Kim N
Korean J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 54(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 38072448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalogram synthesis and landmark detection in dental cone-beam CT systems.
Huang Y; Fan F; Syben C; Roser P; Mill L; Maier A
Med Image Anal; 2021 May; 70():102028. PubMed ID: 33744833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The genial tubercle: A prospective novel landmark for the diagnosis of mandibular asymmetry.
Lee SY; Choi DS; Jang I; Song GS; Cha BK
Korean J Orthod; 2017 Jan; 47(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 28127539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.
Delamare EL; Liedke GS; Vizzotto MB; da Silveira HL; Ribeiro JL; Silveira HE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):414-23. PubMed ID: 20841459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of integration of dental cast and cephalograms compared with cone-beam computed tomography: a comparative study.
Dai F; Chen S; Feng T; Lu W; Chen G; Jiang J; Jiang R; Lin J; Han B; Xu T
Odontology; 2023 Jan; 111(1):238-247. PubMed ID: 35945305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Landmark errors on posteroanterior cephalograms.
Ulkur F; Ozdemir F; Germec-Cakan D; Kaspar EC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 27476366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and Reproducibility of Landmark Identification in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Digital Lateral Vis-A-Vis CBCT-Derived 3D Cephalograms.
Kochhar AS; Nucci L; Sidhu MS; Prabhakar M; Grassia V; Perillo L; Kochhar GK; Bhasin R; Dadlani H; d'Apuzzo F
J Clin Med; 2021 Feb; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 33540549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and landmark error calculation using cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
Grauer D; Cevidanes LS; Styner MA; Heulfe I; Harmon ET; Zhu H; Proffit WR
Angle Orthod; 2010 Mar; 80(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 19905853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of Reference Ear Plug to improve accuracy of lateral cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Hwang HS; Lee KM; Uhm GS; Cho JH; McNamara JA
Korean J Orthod; 2013 Apr; 43(2):54-61. PubMed ID: 23671830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 21459833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
