These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30603963)
1. SOS Response Inhibitory Properties by Potential Probiotic Formulations of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 and Bacillus subtilis KATMIRA1933 Obtained by Solid-State Fermentation. Prazdnova EV; Mazanko MS; Bren AB; Chistyakov VA; Weeks R; Chikindas ML Curr Microbiol; 2019 Mar; 76(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 30603963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Use of Biosensors to Explore the Potential of Probiotic Strains to Reduce the SOS Response and Mutagenesis in Bacteria. Chistyakov VA; Prazdnova EV; Mazanko MS; Bren AB Biosensors (Basel); 2018 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 29547508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA-protection and antioxidant properties of fermentates from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 and Bacillus subtilis KATMIRA1933. Prazdnova EV; Chistyakov VA; Churilov MN; Mazanko MS; Bren AB; Volski A; Chikindas ML Lett Appl Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 61(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 26370336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential Probiotics Bacillus subtilis KATMIRA1933 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 Co-Aggregate with Clinical Isolates of Proteus mirabilis and Prevent Biofilm Formation. Algburi A; Alazzawi SA; Al-Ezzy AIA; Weeks R; Chistyakov V; Chikindas ML Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2020 Dec; 12(4):1471-1483. PubMed ID: 31989448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inhibition of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide genotoxicity by Bacillus strains. Caldini G; Trotta F; Cenci G Res Microbiol; 2002 Apr; 153(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 12002566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of an Industrial Soybean Byproduct for the Potential Development of a Probiotic Animal Feed Additive with Bacillus Species. Mahoney R; Weeks R; Zheng T; Huang Q; Dai W; Cao Y; Liu G; Guo Y; Chistyakov V; Chikindas ML Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2020 Sep; 12(3):1173-1178. PubMed ID: 31784951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro inhibitory activity of probiotic spore-forming bacilli against genotoxins. Cenci G; Caldini G; Trotta F; Bosi P Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 46(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 18194161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Influence of lactitol and lactulose on adhesion properties of Bacillus subtilis probiotic strains]. Avdeeva LV; Osadchaia AI; Kharkhota MA Mikrobiol Z; 2012; 74(5):22-5. PubMed ID: 23120982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Probiotic features of carotene producing strains Bacillus sp. 1.1 and B. amyloliquefaciens UCM B-5113]. Avdeeva LV; Nechypurenko OO; Kharhota MA Mikrobiol Z; 2015; 77(2):22-7. PubMed ID: 26036029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulation of the SOS response in Bacillus subtilis: evidence for a LexA repressor homolog. Wojciechowski MF; Peterson KR; Love PE J Bacteriol; 1991 Oct; 173(20):6489-98. PubMed ID: 1917874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heterologous expression and enzymatic characterization of γ-glutamyltranspeptidase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Lee JM; Lee J; Nam GH; Son BS; Jang MU; Lee SW; Hurh BS; Kim TJ J Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 55(2):147-152. PubMed ID: 28120195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fundamental Basis of Creation of Probiotic with Provitamin Activity Based on Strains Bacillus amyloliquefaciens IMV В-7513 and IMV B-7525. Avdeeva LV; Kharkhota MA; Nechypurenko OO Mikrobiol Z; 2016; 78(6):84-91. PubMed ID: 30141886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fermentation optimization of surfactin production of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens HM618. Liu S; Tang MH; Cheng JS Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2023 Feb; 70(1):38-50. PubMed ID: 35201642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prebiotic, Probiotic, Antimicrobial, and Functional Food Applications of WoldemariamYohannes K; Wan Z; Yu Q; Li H; Wei X; Liu Y; Wang J; Sun B J Agric Food Chem; 2020 Dec; 68(50):14709-14727. PubMed ID: 33280382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Detection of SOS response inhibitor with E. coli GW1104 and GW1107 and its mechanism]. Qian J; Jin ZC Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Mar; 28(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 7924653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Purification of an SOS repressor from Bacillus subtilis. Lovett CM; Cho KC; O'Gara TM J Bacteriol; 1993 Nov; 175(21):6842-9. PubMed ID: 8226626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs. Guo X; Li D; Lu W; Piao X; Chen X Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2006 Aug; 90(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 16820971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A chemical screening method for menaquinone-producing strains based on HPLC-UV technology. Cao S; Du X; Li P; Yuan G; Chen S; Chen W; Song X; Kuang B J Microbiol Methods; 2020 May; 172():105907. PubMed ID: 32240706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]