These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30604992)

  • 1. Learned biases in the processing of outcomes: A brief review of the outcome predictability effect.
    Griffiths O; Livesey E; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 30604992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The outcome predictability bias is evident in overt attention.
    Griffiths O; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):290-300. PubMed ID: 31070432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcome predictability biases learning.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ; Bethmont A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 25706542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer of associability and relational structure in human associative learning.
    Livesey EJ; Don HJ; Uengoer M; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 30816735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The onset of uncertainty facilitates the learning of new associations by increasing attention to cues.
    Easdale LC; Le Pelley ME; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 28766369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surprise-induced enhancements in the associability of Pavlovian cues facilitate learning across behavior systems.
    Márquez I; Loewinger G; Vargas JP; López JC; Díaz E; Esber GR
    Behav Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 136(4):285-292. PubMed ID: 35175064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learned changes in outcome associability.
    Quigley MC; Eatherington CJ; Haselgrove M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):209-221. PubMed ID: 28627301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explaining learned predictiveness: Roles of attention and integration of associative structures.
    Rodríguez G; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 30945925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning.
    Le Pelley ME; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Feb; 56(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 12623538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome predictability biases cued search.
    Griffiths O; Erlinger M; Beesley T; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1215-1223. PubMed ID: 29389193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dorsolateral striatum is critical for the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability.
    Asem JS; Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 42(5):2203-13. PubMed ID: 26108257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learned predictiveness models predict opposite attention biases in the inverse base-rate effect.
    Don HJ; Beesley T; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):143-162. PubMed ID: 30869934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A double error dynamic asymptote model of associative learning.
    Kokkola NH; Mondragón E; Alonso E
    Psychol Rev; 2019 Jul; 126(4):506-549. PubMed ID: 30869968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aging and the role of attention in associative learning.
    Mutter SA; Holder JM; Mashburn CA; Luna CM
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 30058825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does learning history shape the associability of outcomes? Further tests of the outcome predictability effect.
    Liu W; Livesey EJ; Lachnit H; Don HJ; Thorwart A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243434. PubMed ID: 33338047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learned predictiveness and outcome predictability effects are not simply two sides of the same coin.
    Thorwart A; Livesey EJ; Wilhelm F; Liu W; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(4):341-365. PubMed ID: 28981309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention biases in the inverse base-rate effect persist into new learning.
    Don HJ; Livesey EJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Apr; 74(4):669-681. PubMed ID: 33327859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning.
    Beesley T; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 20718547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of reward timing information on cue associability are mediated by amygdala central nucleus.
    Wheeler DS; Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 125(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21319887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blocking and associability change.
    Jones PM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jul; 39(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 23668185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.