These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30604999)

  • 1. Uncertainty and blocking in human causal learning.
    Jones PM; Zaksaite T; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):111-124. PubMed ID: 30604999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Theory protection in associative learning: Humans maintain certain beliefs in a manner that violates prediction error.
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 31556642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the deductive inferential account of blocking in causal learning.
    Livesey EJ; Greenaway JK; Schubert S; Thorwart A
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1120-1132. PubMed ID: 30912035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of common elements in the redundancy effect.
    Uengoer M; Lachnit H; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):286-296. PubMed ID: 32730082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The redundancy effect in human causal learning: No evidence for changes in selective attention.
    Jones PM; Zaksaite T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1748-1760. PubMed ID: 28695765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. People want to see information that will help them make valid inferences in human causal learning.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1133-9. PubMed ID: 17128611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The redundancy effect is related to a lack of conditioned inhibition: Evidence from a task in which excitation and inhibition are symmetrical.
    Zaksaite T; Jones PM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):260-278. PubMed ID: 31498020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions between the elements of an outcome in human associative learning.
    Quigley M; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):297-313. PubMed ID: 32730083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The hide-and-seek of retrospective revaluation: recovery from blocking is context dependent in human causal learning.
    Boddez Y; Baeyens F; Hermans D; Beckers T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 21319914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The onset of uncertainty facilitates the learning of new associations by increasing attention to cues.
    Easdale LC; Le Pelley ME; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 28766369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Encouraging children to think counterfactually enhances blocking in a causal learning task.
    McCormack T; Simms V; McGourty J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1910-26. PubMed ID: 23425340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonreactive testing: Evaluating the effect of withholding feedback in predictive learning.
    Lee JC; Le Pelley ME; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 34843336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A test for a difference in the associability of blocked and uninformative cues in human predictive learning.
    Uengoer M; Dwyer DM; Koenig S; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):222-237. PubMed ID: 28649906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reasoning about redundant and non-redundant alternative causes of a single outcome: Blocking or enhancement caused by the stronger cause.
    Baetu I; Baker AG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):238-250. PubMed ID: 28856980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causal superlearning arising from interactions among cues.
    Urushihara K; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(2):183-196. PubMed ID: 28383940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The fate of redundant cues: Further analysis of the redundancy effect.
    Jones PM; Pearce JM
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 25537840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protecting the Rescorla-Wagner (1972) theory: A reply to Spicer et al. (2020).
    Chan YY; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(2):211-215. PubMed ID: 34264725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learned biases in the processing of outcomes: A brief review of the outcome predictability effect.
    Griffiths O; Livesey E; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 30604992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative salience versus relative validity: cue salience influences blocking in human associative learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):116-32. PubMed ID: 24099508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.