These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3060686)
1. A civil liberties analysis of surrogacy arrangements. Gostin L Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 3060686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An essay on surrogacy and feminist thought. Mahoney J Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):81-8. PubMed ID: 3205045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surrogate motherhood: the challenge for feminists. Andrews LB Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):72-80. PubMed ID: 3205044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Surrogate motherhood as prenatal adoption. Steinbock B Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):44-50. PubMed ID: 3205040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. From the individual to the dividual: in the supermarket of "reproductive alternatives. Mies M Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 11650396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Beyond Baby M: international perspectives on gestational surrogacy and the demise of the unitary biological mother. Krim TM Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):193-226. PubMed ID: 10184657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Compelling pregnancy at death's door. Taylor KA Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Privacy, surrogacy, and the Baby M case. Allen AL Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1759-92. PubMed ID: 11649250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protectionism and freedom of contract: the erosion of female autonomy in surrogacy decisions. Munyon JH Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 2003; 36(3):717-44. PubMed ID: 15568233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Touchdowns, toddlers, and taboos: on paying college athletes and surrogate contract mothers. Rush SE Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):549-614. PubMed ID: 11659320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The case of Baby M: love's labor lost. Smith GP Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):121-5. PubMed ID: 3060681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The deflective power of reproductive technologies: the impact on women. Woliver LR Women Polit; 1989; 9(3):17-47. PubMed ID: 11659737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In the matter of Baby M: rejudged. Raymond JG Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 11650375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legislative approaches to surrogate motherhood. Charo RA Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):96-112. PubMed ID: 3060687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Procreative liberty and the state's burden of proof in regulating noncoital reproduction. Robertson JA Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):18-26. PubMed ID: 3060682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Baby M Turns 30: The Law and Policy of Surrogate Motherhood. Feldman EA Am J Law Med; 2018 Mar; 44(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 29764324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Providing protection for collaborative noncoital reproduction: surrogate motherhood and other new procreative technologies, and the right of intimate association. Ikemoto LC Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(4):1273-309. PubMed ID: 11650138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]