These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30607349)

  • 1. Development of a new ball-type phantom for evaluation of the image layer of panoramic radiography.
    Yeom HG; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Dec; 48(4):255-259. PubMed ID: 30607349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between spatial resolution and ball distortion rate of panoramic radiography.
    Yeom HG; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):68. PubMed ID: 32560631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of panorama resolution phantom for comprehensive evaluation of the horizontal and vertical resolution of panoramic radiography.
    Yeom HG; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Lee SJ
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16529. PubMed ID: 33020526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated measurement for image distortion analysis in 2D panoramic imaging of dental CBCT system: A phantom study.
    Rabba JA; Suhaimi FM; Mat Jafri MZ; Jaafar HA; Osman ND
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):533-538. PubMed ID: 36913788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative localization of impacted mesiodens using panoramic and periapical radiographs.
    Choi HM; Han JW; Park IW; Baik JS; Seo HW; Lee JH; Park HW
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2011 Jun; 41(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 21977477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.
    Vazquez L; Nizamaldin Y; Combescure C; Nedir R; Bischof M; Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Carrel JP; Belser UC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20110429. PubMed ID: 23360688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the panoramic image formation in different anatomic positions.
    Ladeira DB; Cruz AD; Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(5):458-62. PubMed ID: 21180804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping of a multilayer panoramic radiography device.
    Martins LAC; Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 May; 51(4):20210082. PubMed ID: 34757830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of positioning errors on magnification factors in the mandible in digital panorama imaging].
    Schulze R; Schalldach F; d'Hoedt B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 May; 4(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 10900960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic focal plane estimation for dental panoramic radiography.
    Kim S; Ra JB
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4907-4917. PubMed ID: 31520417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis.
    Devlin H; Yuan J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):29951683. PubMed ID: 22933529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of digitalized panorama and cone beam computed tomographic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implant surgery.
    Yim JH; Ryu DM; Lee BS; Kwon YD
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):669-73. PubMed ID: 21415634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting the actual length of premolar teeth on the basis of panoramic radiology.
    Yassaei S; Ezoddini-Ardakani F; Ostovar N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(4):468-73. PubMed ID: 21187607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quantitative analysis of the complete image layer in rotational panoramic radiography].
    Naitoh M
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1199-224. PubMed ID: 2135152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality.
    Choi DH; Choi BR; Choi JW; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC; Lee SS
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2013 Mar; 43(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 23526047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Measurement of mesiodistal root angulation for panoramic images and the effect of buccolingual root angulation].
    Garcia-Figueroa MA; Raboud DW; Lam EW; Heo G; Major PW
    Int Orthod; 2009 Mar; 7(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 20303900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in mesiodistal root angulation of panoramic images generated from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Liu SQ; Wen FJ; Chen H; Liu Y
    Chin J Dent Res; 2013; 16(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 24436945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast reference values in panoramic radiographic images using an arch-form phantom stand.
    Shin JM; Lee C; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC; Lee SS
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2016 Sep; 46(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 27672616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):166-8. PubMed ID: 9735460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic radiography and reconstructed panoramic images from cone beam computed tomography].
    Liu S; Wen F; Chen H; Liu Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24697881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.