590 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30607809)
1. EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery.
Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N
Patient; 2019 Aug; 12(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 30607809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery.
Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):501-511. PubMed ID: 31902023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients.
Breheny K; Hollingworth W; Kandiyali R; Dixon P; Loose A; Craggs P; Grzeda M; Sparrow J
Qual Life Res; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1935-1946. PubMed ID: 32080789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the preference-based EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
Yang F; Lau T; Lee E; Vathsala A; Chia KS; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Dec; 16(9):1019-26. PubMed ID: 25519850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke patients.
Golicki D; Niewada M; Karlińska A; Buczek J; Kobayashi A; Janssen MF; Pickard AS
Qual Life Res; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1555-63. PubMed ID: 25425288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
Li N; Boonen A; van den Bergh JP; van Kuijk SMJ; Wyers CE; van Oostwaard M; Vranken L; Bours SPG; Hiligsmann M
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):829-839. PubMed ID: 35674412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with health complaints attributed to their amalgam fillings: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing amalgam removal.
Lamu AN; Björkman L; Hamre HJ; Alræk T; Musial F; Robberstad B
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Apr; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 33865400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.
Law EH; Pickard AS; Xie F; Walton SM; Lee TA; Schwartz A
Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):968-982. PubMed ID: 30403577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of measurement properties between UK SF-6D and English EQ-5D-5L and Thai EQ-5D-5L value sets in general Thai population.
Kangwanrattanakul K
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Aug; 21(4):765-774. PubMed ID: 32981380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D Utilities of Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders of Different Severity: A Health-Related Quality of Life Approach.
Kontodimopoulos N; Stamatopoulou E; Gazi S; Moschou D; Krikelis M; Talias MA
J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35887861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parallel Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L by Time Trade-Off in Hungary.
Rencz F; Brodszky V; Gulácsi L; Golicki D; Ruzsa G; Pickard AS; Law EH; Péntek M
Value Health; 2020 Sep; 23(9):1235-1245. PubMed ID: 32940242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-Utility Analysis Using EQ-5D-5L Data: Does How the Utilities Are Derived Matter?
Yang F; Devlin N; Luo N
Value Health; 2019 Jan; 22(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 30661633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D.
Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Ikeda S; Igarashi A; Noto S; Saito S; Shimozuma K
Qual Life Res; 2016 Mar; 25(3):707-19. PubMed ID: 26303761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L Over Time? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Responsiveness of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Nine Countries.
Janssen MF; Buchholz I; Golicki D; Bonsel GJ
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Nov; 40(11):1081-1093. PubMed ID: 35930137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in patients following total hip or knee replacement.
Jin X; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Marshall DA; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2409-2417. PubMed ID: 31089988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responsiveness of the anxiety/depression dimension of the 3- and 5-level versions of the EQ-5D in assessing mental health.
Crick K; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1625-1633. PubMed ID: 29516342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire in self-reported diabetes: evidence from a general population survey.
Jankowska A; Młyńczak K; Golicki D
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 May; 19(1):138. PubMed ID: 33952271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in Pompe disease.
Kanters TA; Redekop WK; Kruijshaar ME; van der Ploeg AT; Rutten-van Mölken MP; Hakkaart L
Qual Life Res; 2015 Apr; 24(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 25342117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
