These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30607987)

  • 41. Acetabular shape and orientation of the spastic hip in children with cerebral palsy.
    Jóźwiak M; Rychlik M; Szymczak W; Grzegorzewski A; Musielak B
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2021 May; 63(5):608-613. PubMed ID: 33415726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Functional acetabular component position with supine total hip replacement.
    Eilander W; Harris SJ; Henkus HE; Cobb JP; Hogervorst T
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1326-31. PubMed ID: 24078527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reliability and validity of measuring acetabular component orientation by plain anteroposterior radiographs.
    Lu M; Zhou YX; Du H; Zhang J; Liu J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Sep; 471(9):2987-94. PubMed ID: 23645336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sex- and age-specific differences in femoral head coverage and acetabular morphology among healthy subjects-derivation of normal ranges and thresholds for abnormality.
    Miyasaka D; Sakai Y; Ibuchi S; Suzuki H; Imai N; Endo N
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Apr; 46(4):523-531. PubMed ID: 28150099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Validation of a CT image based software for three-dimensional measurement of acetabular cup orientation.
    Wassilew GI; Janz V; Heller M; Wenzl M; Perka C; Hasart O
    Technol Health Care; 2011; 19(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 21957510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. How are dysplastic hips different? A three-dimensional CT study.
    van Bosse H; Wedge JH; Babyn P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 May; 473(5):1712-23. PubMed ID: 25524428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of cup orientation in hip resurfacing: a comparison of TraumaCad and computed tomography.
    Westacott DJ; McArthur J; King RJ; Foguet P
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Apr; 8():8. PubMed ID: 23577620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Acetabular coverage differs between standing and supine positions: model-based assessment of low-dose biplanar radiographs and comparison with CT.
    Fritz B; Agten CA; Boldt FK; Zingg PO; Pfirrmann CWA; Sutter R
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5691-5699. PubMed ID: 30903332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Correct Assessment of Acetabular Component Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty From Plane Radiographs.
    Widmer D; Reising K; Kotter E; Helwig P
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2652-2659.e3. PubMed ID: 29615377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Validation of a statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction method for determination of cup orientation after THA.
    Zheng G; von Recum J; Nolte LP; Grützner PA; Steppacher SD; Franke J
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Mar; 7(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 21792672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Acetabular orientation: anatomical and functional measurement.
    Lubovsky O; Wright D; Hardisty M; Kiss A; Kreder H; Whyne C
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Mar; 7(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 21822915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements.
    Davda K; Smyth N; Cobb JP; Hart AJ
    Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 25674698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Measurement of acetabular inclination and anteversion via CT generated 3D pelvic model.
    Wang RY; Xu WH; Kong XC; Yang L; Yang SH
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):373. PubMed ID: 28851328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Risk factors for increased sagittal pelvic motion causing unfavourable orientation of the acetabular component in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
    Langston J; Pierrepont J; Gu Y; Shimmin A
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):845-852. PubMed ID: 29954196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Age estimation based on the acetabulum using global illumination rendering with computed tomography.
    Belghith M; Marchand E; Ben Khelil M; Rougé-Maillart C; Blum A; Martrille L
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Sep; 135(5):1923-1934. PubMed ID: 33713164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pelvic tilt compensates for increased acetabular anteversion.
    Zahn RK; Grotjohann S; Ramm H; Zachow S; Putzier M; Perka C; Tohtz S
    Int Orthop; 2016 Aug; 40(8):1571-1575. PubMed ID: 26318879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Measurement of acetabular cup anteversion with the circle theorem.
    Kosiyatrakul A; Luenam S; Chotanaphuti T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S128-33. PubMed ID: 20120674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Does Acetabular Coverage Vary Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Patients with Hip Dysplasia?
    Tachibana T; Fujii M; Kitamura K; Nakamura T; Nakashima Y
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Nov; 477(11):2455-2466. PubMed ID: 31389893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software.
    Lahy J; Stevens J; McKenzie D; de Steiger R
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(2):2309499017718953. PubMed ID: 28675977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.