These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30608763)

  • 1. Experimentally Robust Self-testing for Bipartite and Tripartite Entangled States.
    Zhang WH; Chen G; Peng XX; Ye XJ; Yin P; Xiao Y; Hou ZB; Cheng ZD; Wu YC; Xu JS; Li CF; Guo GC
    Phys Rev Lett; 2018 Dec; 121(24):240402. PubMed ID: 30608763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analytic and Nearly Optimal Self-Testing Bounds for the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt and Mermin Inequalities.
    Kaniewski J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Aug; 117(7):070402. PubMed ID: 27563939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. All bipartite entangled States display some hidden nonlocality.
    Masanes L; Liang YC; Doherty AC
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Mar; 100(9):090403. PubMed ID: 18352681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymptotic violation of Bell inequalities and distillability.
    Masanes L
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Aug; 97(5):050503. PubMed ID: 17026086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bell's inequality violation with spins in silicon.
    Dehollain JP; Simmons S; Muhonen JT; Kalra R; Laucht A; Hudson F; Itoh KM; Jamieson DN; McCallum JC; Dzurak AS; Morello A
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2016 Mar; 11(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 26571006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Device-independent entanglement quantification and related applications.
    Moroder T; Bancal JD; Liang YC; Hofmann M; Gühne O
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Jul; 111(3):030501. PubMed ID: 23909300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Secrecy in Prepare-and-Measure Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Tests with a Qubit Bound.
    Woodhead E; Pironio S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Oct; 115(15):150501. PubMed ID: 26550712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterizing entanglement of an artificial atom and a cavity cat state with Bell's inequality.
    Vlastakis B; Petrenko A; Ofek N; Sun L; Leghtas Z; Sliwa K; Liu Y; Hatridge M; Blumoff J; Frunzio L; Mirrahimi M; Jiang L; Devoret MH; Schoelkopf RJ
    Nat Commun; 2015 Nov; 6():8970. PubMed ID: 26611724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Activation of nonlocal quantum resources.
    Navascués M; Vértesi T
    Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Feb; 106(6):060403. PubMed ID: 21405447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Entanglement swapping with autonomous polarization-entangled photon pairs from a warm atomic ensemble.
    Park J; Kim H; Seb Moon H
    Opt Lett; 2020 Apr; 45(8):2403-2406. PubMed ID: 32287244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental violation of a spin-1 bell inequality using maximally entangled four-photon states.
    Howell JC; Lamas-Linares A; Bouwmeester D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Jan; 88(3):030401. PubMed ID: 11801048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct measurement of nonlinear properties of bipartite quantum states.
    Bovino FA; Castagnoli G; Ekert A; Horodecki P; Alves CM; Sergienko AV
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Dec; 95(24):240407. PubMed ID: 16384360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arbitrarily Many Independent Observers Can Share the Nonlocality of a Single Maximally Entangled Qubit Pair.
    Brown PJ; Colbeck R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Aug; 125(9):090401. PubMed ID: 32915619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bright nanoscale source of deterministic entangled photon pairs violating Bell's inequality.
    Jöns KD; Schweickert L; Versteegh MAM; Dalacu D; Poole PJ; Gulinatti A; Giudice A; Zwiller V; Reimer ME
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1700. PubMed ID: 28490728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested.
    Coladangelo A; Goh KT; Scarani V
    Nat Commun; 2017 May; 8():15485. PubMed ID: 28548093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental entangled entanglement.
    Walther P; Resch KJ; Brukner C; Zeilinger A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Jul; 97(2):020501. PubMed ID: 16907422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Demonstration of Quantum Nonlocality in the Presence of Measurement Dependence.
    Aktas D; Tanzilli S; Martin A; Pütz G; Thew R; Gisin N
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Jun; 114(22):220404. PubMed ID: 26196606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental full-domain mapping of quantum correlation in Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenarios.
    Tong X; He Z; Zhang Y; Solomon S; Lin L; Song Q; Wang LV
    Phys Rev Appl; 2023 Mar; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 38249539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hacking the Bell test using classical light in energy-time entanglement-based quantum key distribution.
    Jogenfors J; Elhassan AM; Ahrens J; Bourennane M; Larsson JÅ
    Sci Adv; 2015 Dec; 1(11):e1500793. PubMed ID: 26824059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental self-testing for photonic graph states.
    Xu JM; Zhou Q; Yang YX; Cheng ZM; Xu XY; Ren ZC; Wang XL; Wang HT
    Opt Express; 2022 Jan; 30(1):101-111. PubMed ID: 35201184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.