455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30610244)
1. Cost-effectiveness of implementing guidelines for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in Japan.
Moriwaki K; Fukuda H
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Feb; 30(2):299-310. PubMed ID: 30610244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of osteoporosis screening and treatment strategy for postmenopausal Japanese women.
Yoshimura M; Moriwaki K; Noto S; Takiguchi T
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Feb; 28(2):643-652. PubMed ID: 27743068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of drugs for osteoporosis treatment in elderly Japanese women at high risk of fragility fractures: comparison of denosumab and weekly alendronate.
Yoshizawa T; Nishino T; Okubo I; Yamazaki M
Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Aug; 13(1):94. PubMed ID: 30159632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan.
Moriwaki K; Mouri M; Hagino H
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jun; 28(6):1939-1950. PubMed ID: 28265718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of osteoporosis liaison service for secondary fracture prevention in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with previous hip fracture in Japan.
Moriwaki K; Noto S
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Feb; 28(2):621-632. PubMed ID: 27699441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan.
Mori T; Crandall CJ; Ganz DA
Osteoporos Int; 2017 May; 28(5):1733-1744. PubMed ID: 28210776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Stevenson M; Jones ML; De Nigris E; Brewer N; Davis S; Oakley J
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jun; 9(22):1-160. PubMed ID: 15929857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of gastro-resistant risedronate tablets for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in France.
Hiligsmann M; Reginster JY
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Mar; 30(3):649-658. PubMed ID: 30701342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation on the cost-effective threshold of osteoporosis treatment on elderly women in China using discrete event simulation model.
Ni W; Jiang Y
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Feb; 28(2):529-538. PubMed ID: 27581955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of alendronate for the treatment of osteopenic postmenopausal women in Japan.
Moriwaki K; Komaba H; Noto S; Yanagisawa S; Takiguchi T; Inoue H; Toujo T; Fukagawa M; Takahashi HE
J Bone Miner Res; 2013 Feb; 28(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 22991163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological fracture prevention for osteoporosis as prescribed in clinical practice in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom.
Svedbom A; Hadji P; Hernlund E; Thoren R; McCloskey E; Stad R; Stollenwerk B
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1745-1754. PubMed ID: 31270592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost effectiveness of denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis in the US.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Yurgin N; Huang J; Viswanathan HN; Taylor D
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 11(5):485-97. PubMed ID: 23868102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health-economic comparison of three recommended drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Brecht JG; Kruse HP; Möhrke W; Oestreich A; Huppertz E
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 2004; 24(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15575171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vitamin K supplementation for the primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: is it cost-effective and is future research warranted?
Gajic-Veljanoski O; Bayoumi AM; Tomlinson G; Khan K; Cheung AM
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Nov; 23(11):2681-92. PubMed ID: 22398856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision.
Yong JH; Masucci L; Hoch JS; Sujic R; Beaton D
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Jan; 27(1):231-40. PubMed ID: 26275439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Therapies for treatment of osteoporosis in US women: cost-effectiveness and budget impact considerations.
Tosteson AN; Burge RT; Marshall DA; Lindsay R
Am J Manag Care; 2008 Sep; 14(9):605-15. PubMed ID: 18778176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab for high-risk postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Thailand.
Pongchaiyakul C; Nanagara R; Songpatanasilp T; Unnanuntana A
J Med Econ; 2020 Jul; 23(7):776-785. PubMed ID: 32063082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intervention thresholds for denosumab in the UK using a FRAX®-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ström O; Jönsson B; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2013 Apr; 24(4):1491-502. PubMed ID: 23224141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden.
Murphy DR; Smolen LJ; Klein TM; Klein RW
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():213. PubMed ID: 23110626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention in rural women with limited access to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Ito K; Leslie WD
Osteoporos Int; 2015 Aug; 26(8):2111-9. PubMed ID: 25807913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
