174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30611549)
1. Mitochondrial DNA copy number as a predictor of embryo viability.
Cecchino GN; Garcia-Velasco JA
Fertil Steril; 2019 Feb; 111(2):205-211. PubMed ID: 30611549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Introduction: Stimulate the mitochondria! A Bonington approach to improving assisted reproductive technology outcomes or a call to action?
Legro RS
Fertil Steril; 2019 Feb; 111(2):195-196. PubMed ID: 30691622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metabolic imaging via fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy for egg and embryo assessment.
Sanchez T; Zhang M; Needleman D; Seli E
Fertil Steril; 2019 Feb; 111(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 30691624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mitochondrial DNA quantity as a biomarker for blastocyst implantation potential.
Wells D
Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):742-747. PubMed ID: 29101999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mitochondrial DNA content as a viability score in human euploid embryos: less is better.
Diez-Juan A; Rubio C; Marin C; Martinez S; Al-Asmar N; Riboldi M; Díaz-Gimeno P; Valbuena D; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):534-41.e1. PubMed ID: 26051102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates.
Irani M; Reichman D; Robles A; Melnick A; Davis O; Zaninovic N; Xu K; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):664-670. PubMed ID: 28069172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Introduction: Biomarkers of embryo viability: the search for the "holy grail" of embryo selection.
Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):719-721. PubMed ID: 29101996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulus cell transcriptome profiling is not predictive of live birth after in vitro fertilization: a paired analysis of euploid sibling blastocysts.
Green KA; Franasiak JM; Werner MD; Tao X; Landis JN; Scott RT; Treff NR
Fertil Steril; 2018 Mar; 109(3):460-466.e2. PubMed ID: 29428306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mitochondrial unfolded protein response: a stress response with implications for fertility and reproductive aging.
Seli E; Wang T; Horvath TL
Fertil Steril; 2019 Feb; 111(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 30691623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mitochondrial DNA as a biomarker for in-vitro fertilization outcome.
Seli E
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 28(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 27077472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aging and the environment affect gamete and embryo potential: can we intervene?
Meldrum DR; Casper RF; Diez-Juan A; Simon C; Domar AD; Frydman R
Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):548-559. PubMed ID: 26812244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blastulation timing is associated with differential mitochondrial content in euploid embryos.
Ho JR; Arrach N; Rhodes-Long K; Salem W; McGinnis LK; Chung K; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Ahmady A
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Apr; 35(4):711-720. PubMed ID: 29353449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing.
Maxwell SM; Colls P; Hodes-Wertz B; McCulloh DH; McCaffrey C; Wells D; Munné S; Grifo JA
Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1414-1419.e5. PubMed ID: 27692437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mitochondrial DNA content is not predictive of reproductive competence in euploid blastocysts.
Scott RT; Sun L; Zhan Y; Marin D; Tao X; Seli E
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Aug; 41(2):183-190. PubMed ID: 32600944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterizing nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in spent embryo culture media: genetic contamination identified.
Hammond ER; McGillivray BC; Wicker SM; Peek JC; Shelling AN; Stone P; Chamley LW; Cree LM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):220-228.e5. PubMed ID: 27865449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extent of chromosomal mosaicism influences the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization treatments.
Spinella F; Fiorentino F; Biricik A; Bono S; Ruberti A; Cotroneo E; Baldi M; Cursio E; Minasi MG; Greco E
Fertil Steril; 2018 Jan; 109(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 29191449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy?
Zaninovic N; Irani M; Meseguer M
Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):722-729. PubMed ID: 29101997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mitochondrial DNA Assessment to Determine Oocyte and Embryo Viability.
Fragouli E; Wells D
Semin Reprod Med; 2015 Nov; 33(6):401-9. PubMed ID: 26565384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos.
Fragouli E; Alfarawati S; Spath K; Wells D
Mol Hum Reprod; 2014 Feb; 20(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 24184690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles.
Friedenthal J; Maxwell SM; Munné S; Kramer Y; McCulloh DH; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
Fertil Steril; 2018 Apr; 109(4):627-632. PubMed ID: 29605407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
