BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30611969)

  • 21. Multidimensional Scales of Perceived Self-Efficacy (MSPSE): Measurement invariance across Italian and Colombian adolescents.
    Basili E; Gomez Plata M; Paba Barbosa C; Gerbino M; Thartori E; Lunetti C; Uribe Tirado LM; Ruiz García M; Luengo Kanacri BP; Tamayo Giraldo G; Narvaez Marin M; Laghi F; Pastorelli C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227756. PubMed ID: 31940400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factor structure of the CES-D and measurement invariance across gender in Mainland Chinese adolescents.
    Wang M; Armour C; Wu Y; Ren F; Zhu X; Yao S
    J Clin Psychol; 2013 Sep; 69(9):966-79. PubMed ID: 23775279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Examining the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children in a Diverse Sample of Trauma-Exposed Adolescents.
    Morelli NM; Elson D; Duong JB; Evans MC; Villodas MT
    Assessment; 2021 Jul; 28(5):1471-1487. PubMed ID: 32667211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rural/urban differences in the distribution of eating disorder symptoms among adolescents from community samples.
    Preti A; Pinna C; Nocco S; Pilia S; Mulliri E; Micheli V; Casta MC; Petretto DR; Masala C
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 41(6):525-35. PubMed ID: 17508323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The validity of the symptom checklist depression and anxiety subscales: A general population study in Sweden.
    Lundin A; Hallgren M; Forsell Y
    J Affect Disord; 2015 Sep; 183():247-52. PubMed ID: 26025371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance by gender, age and levels of psychological distress of the short TEMPS-A.
    Preti A; Vellante M; Gabbrielli M; Lai V; Muratore T; Pintus E; Pintus M; Sanna S; Scanu R; Tronci D; Corrias I; Petretto DR; Carta MG
    J Affect Disord; 2013 Dec; 151(3):995-1002. PubMed ID: 24054919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised.
    Elliott R; Fox CM; Beltyukova SA; Stone GE; Gunderson J; Zhang X
    Psychol Assess; 2006 Dec; 18(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 17154757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Psychometric Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form in French Canadian Young Adults.
    Doré I; O'Loughlin JL; Sabiston CM; Fournier L
    Can J Psychiatry; 2017 Apr; 62(4):286-294. PubMed ID: 28363262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability and validity assessment of the revised Symptom Checklist 90 for alopecia areata patients in China.
    Tan H; Lan XM; Yu NL; Yang XC
    J Dermatol; 2015 Oct; 42(10):975-80. PubMed ID: 26072969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the SCL-9S, a short version of the symptom checklist-90-R, on psychiatric patients in Sweden by using Rasch analysis.
    Lundqvist LO; Schröder A
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2021 Oct; 75(7):538-546. PubMed ID: 33781164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Item response theory and differential test functioning analysis of the HBSC-Symptom-Checklist across 46 countries.
    Heinz A; Sischka PE; Catunda C; Cosma A; García-Moya I; Lyyra N; Kaman A; Ravens-Sieberer U; Pickett W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):253. PubMed ID: 36175865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The problem of structural indeterminacy in multidimensional symptom report instruments. The case of SCL-90-R.
    Vassend O; Skrondal A
    Behav Res Ther; 1999 Jul; 37(7):685-701. PubMed ID: 10402693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 case rule apply in adult survivors of childhood cancer? Comparison with the Symptom Checklist-90.
    Merport A; Recklitis CJ
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2012 Jul; 37(6):650-9. PubMed ID: 22451261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The factor structure of the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL-25) in a student population: A cautionary tale.
    Skogen JC; Øverland S; Smith ORF; Aarø LE
    Scand J Public Health; 2017 Jun; 45(4):357-365. PubMed ID: 28381118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement Invariance of the Internet Addiction Test Among Hong Kong, Japanese, and Malaysian Adolescents.
    Lai CM; Mak KK; Cheng C; Watanabe H; Nomachi S; Bahar N; Young KS; Ko HC; Kim D; Griffiths MD
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2015 Oct; 18(10):609-17. PubMed ID: 26468915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the psychometric and ecometric properties of neighborhood scales using adolescent survey data from urban and rural Scotland.
    Martin G; Inchley J; Humphris G; Currie C
    Popul Health Metr; 2017 Mar; 15(1):11. PubMed ID: 28351425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. SCL-90-R factor structure in an acute, involuntary, adult psychiatric inpatient sample.
    Rauter UK; Leonard CE; Swett CP
    J Clin Psychol; 1996 Nov; 52(6):625-9. PubMed ID: 8912105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Six- and ten-item indexes of psychological distress based on the Symptom Checklist-90.
    Rosen CS; Drescher KD; Moos RH; Finney JW; Murphy RT; Gusman F
    Assessment; 2000 Jun; 7(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 10868247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Internal consistency and validity assessment of SCL-90-R for bariatric surgery candidates.
    Ransom D; Ashton K; Windover A; Heinberg L
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2010; 6(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 20627709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Psychometric properties of the symptom check list 90 (SCL-90) for Chinese undergraduate students.
    Yu Y; Wan C; Huebner ES; Zhao X; Zeng W; Shang L
    J Ment Health; 2019 Apr; 28(2):213-219. PubMed ID: 30465457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.