311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30612246)
1. Randomized clinical trial of class II restoration in permanent teeth comparing ART with composite resin after 12 months.
Menezes-Silva R; Velasco SRM; Bastos RS; Molina G; Honório HM; Frencken JE; Navarro MFL
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Sep; 23(9):3623-3635. PubMed ID: 30612246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus conventional restorations with resin composite in Class II cavities of permanent teeth: two-year follow-up.
Menezes-Silva R; Velasco SRM; BRESCIANi E; Bastos RDS; Navarro MFL
J Appl Oral Sci; 2021; 29():e20200609. PubMed ID: 33656064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized Controlled Trial of Class II ART High-viscosity Glass-ionomer Cement and Conventional Resin-composite restorations in Permanent Dentition: Two-year Survival.
Molina GF; Ulloque MJ; Mazzola I; Mulder J; Frencken J
J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(6):555-565. PubMed ID: 33491400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.
Olegário IC; Hesse D; Bönecker M; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
BMC Oral Health; 2016 Aug; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 27485432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ART with high viscosity GIC and composite restorations in class II cavities: can they thrive in the post-amalgam era?
Gugnani N; Gugnani S
Evid Based Dent; 2020 Mar; 21(1):22-23. PubMed ID: 32221490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomised clinical trial of Class II ART restoration in primary teeth with and without retentive grooves after 12 months.
Pesaressi E; Zelada-Lopez D; Cosme T; Diaz J; Huanqui M; Fidela de Lima Navarro M; Villena RS
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2024 Mar; 25(1):42 - 49. PubMed ID: 38078810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Evaluation of Microhybrid Composite and Glass lonomer Restorative Material in Permanent Teeth.
Kharma K; Zogheib T; Bhandi S; Mehanna C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Feb; 19(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29422475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Could bulk fill glass hybrid restorative materials replace composite resins in treating permanent teeth? A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Uyumaz FÜ; Abaklı İnci M; Özer H
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):702-709. PubMed ID: 38108583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative systems in small class II restorations.
Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; El-Negoly SAE; Mahmoud SH
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Apr; 35(3):538-555. PubMed ID: 36564970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement or composite resin for restorations in posterior permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses.
Cribari L; Madeira L; Roeder RBR; Macedo RM; Wambier LM; Porto TS; Gonzaga CC; Kaizer MR
J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104629. PubMed ID: 37499738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of Giomer and self-etch adhesive compared with nanofilled resin composite and etch-and-rinse adhesive - Results at 8 years.
Tian F; Mu H; Shi Y; Chen X; Zou X; Gao X; Wang X
Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1088-1095. PubMed ID: 38806383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival of multiple-surface ART restorations using a zinc-reinforced glass-ionomer restorative after 2 years: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial.
Mobarak E; El-Deeb H; Daifalla LE; Ghaly M; Mustafa M; Sabry D; Fatah H; Mulder J; Creugers NHJ; Frencken JE
Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):e185-e192. PubMed ID: 31235189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-viscosity glass-ionomer vs. composite resin restorations in persons with disability: Five-year follow-up of clinical trial.
Molina GF; Faulks D; Mulder J; Frencken JE
Braz Oral Res; 2019; 33():e099. PubMed ID: 31778471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 3-year controlled randomized clinical study on the performance of two glass-ionomer cements in Class II cavities of permanent teeth.
Fotiadou C; Frasheri I; Reymus M; Diegritz C; Kessler A; Manhart J; Hickel R; Klinke T; Heck K
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):592-602. PubMed ID: 31286115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions: A systematic review.
Ruengrungsom C; Palamara JEA; Burrow MF
J Dent; 2018 Nov; 78():1-21. PubMed ID: 30017937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
