These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30612314)

  • 1. National assessment of cultural ecosystem services: Participatory mapping in Switzerland.
    Jaligot R; Hasler S; Chenal J
    Ambio; 2019 Oct; 48(10):1219-1233. PubMed ID: 30612314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services for landscape corridor planning: A case study of the Silk Roads corridor in Zhangye, China.
    Xu H; Zhao G; Fagerholm N; Primdahl J; Plieninger T
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 264():110458. PubMed ID: 32250892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying the Spatial Imbalance in the Supply and Demand of Cultural Ecosystem Services.
    Shi Q; Chen H; Liu D; Geng T; Zhang H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mapping and assessing coastal recreation cultural ecosystem services supply, flow, and demand in Lithuania.
    Inácio M; Gomes E; Bogdzevič K; Kalinauskas M; Zhao W; Pereira P
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Dec; 323():116175. PubMed ID: 36088764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mapping and assessment of recreational cultural ecosystem services supply and demand in Vilnius (Lithuania).
    Kalinauskas M; Bogdzevič K; Gomes E; Inácio M; Barcelo D; Zhao W; Pereira P
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 855():158590. PubMed ID: 36165823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): A case study of Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai, China].
    Peng WT; Liu WQ; Cai WB; Wang X; Huang Z; Wu CZ
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Feb; 30(2):439-448. PubMed ID: 30915794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania.
    Kalinauskas M; Mikša K; Inácio M; Gomes E; Pereira P
    J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 286():112239. PubMed ID: 33662753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting cultural ecosystem services use in Vilnius (Lithuania): A participatory mapping survey approach.
    Pinto LV; Inácio M; Bogdzevič K; Kalinauskas M; Gomes E; Pereira P
    Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e15384. PubMed ID: 37101641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the evolution of coupled natural-cultural ecosystem services and their geographically scaled driven modeling in a coastal city of Southeast China.
    Wen L; Li B; Peng Y; Zhou Y; Weng A; Jin Y; Cai G; Lin Y; Chen B
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Jun; 361():121265. PubMed ID: 38820788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the influences of ecological restoration on perceptions of cultural ecosystem services by residents of agricultural landscapes of western China.
    Dou Y; Zhen L; Yu X; Bakker M; Carsjens GJ; Xue Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 646():685-695. PubMed ID: 30059928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cultural ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea marine environment.
    Ahtiainen H; Liski E; Pouta E; Soini K; Bertram C; Rehdanz K; Pakalniete K; Meyerhof J
    Ambio; 2019 Nov; 48(11):1350-1361. PubMed ID: 31473976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services.
    Ridding LE; Redhead JW; Oliver TH; Schmucki R; McGinlay J; Graves AR; Morris J; Bradbury RB; King H; Bullock JM
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():1145-1154. PubMed ID: 30029348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ecosystem service change caused by climatological and non-climatological drivers: a Swiss case study.
    Braun D; de Jong R; Schaepman ME; Furrer R; Hein L; Kienast F; Damm A
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Jun; 29(4):e01901. PubMed ID: 30980439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revealing Spatial Patterns of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Four Agricultural Landscapes: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China.
    He S; Hu C; Li J; Wu J; Xu Q; Lin L; Zhu C; Li Y; Zhou M; Zhu L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35954626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cultural ecosystem services in European grasslands: A systematic review of threats.
    Pellaton R; Lellei-Kovács E; Báldi A
    Ambio; 2022 Dec; 51(12):2462-2477. PubMed ID: 35793012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preserving ecosystem services in urban regions: challenges for planning and best practice examples from Switzerland.
    Tobias S
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Apr; 9(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 23307283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moving towards integrating soil into spatial planning: No net loss of soil-based ecosystem services.
    Drobnik T; Schwaab J; Grêt-Regamey A
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 263():110406. PubMed ID: 32883480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Governing Landscapes for Ecosystem Services: A Participatory Land-Use Scenario Development in the Northwest Montane Region of Vietnam.
    Do TH; Vu TP; Catacutan D; Nguyen VT
    Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 68(5):665-682. PubMed ID: 33098453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectively enhancing perceptions of cultural ecosystem services: A case study of a karst cultural ecosystem.
    Nie X; Wang Q; Wu J; Wang H; Chen Z; He J
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 315():115189. PubMed ID: 35523071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public perception of cultural ecosystem services in historic districts based on biterm topic model.
    Pan Y; Nik Hashim NH; Goh HC
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11717. PubMed ID: 38778095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.