These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30612475)
1. Attitudes toward guardianship, social work goals, and perspectives of disability among social work students. Werner S; Holler R Disabil Rehabil; 2020 Mar; 42(5):712-721. PubMed ID: 30612475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Israeli social workers' recommendations on guardianship and supported decision-making: Examination of client and social worker factors. Werner S; Holler R Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2022; 92(1):109-120. PubMed ID: 34881961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Between the convention and conventional practice: Israeli social workers' recommendations regarding the legal capacity of people with disabilities. Holler R; Werner S J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2022 May; 35(3):826-833. PubMed ID: 35146852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on Victorian guardianship practice. Watson J; Anderson J; Wilson E; Anderson KL Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(12):2806-2814. PubMed ID: 33096002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guardianship law versus supported decision-making policies: Perceptions of persons with intellectual or psychiatric disabilities and parents. Werner S; Chabany R Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2016; 86(5):486-99. PubMed ID: 26652607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Siblings of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Their knowledge and perspectives on guardianship and its alternatives. Brady AM; Burke MM; Landon T; Oertle K J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2019 Sep; 32(5):1078-1087. PubMed ID: 30990247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Getting the Balance Right: Conceptual Considerations Concerning Legal Capacity and Supported Decision-Making. Parker M J Bioeth Inq; 2016 Sep; 13(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 27329177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A critical assessment of supported decision-making for persons aging with intellectual disabilities. Kohn NA; Blumenthal JA Disabil Health J; 2014 Jan; 7(1 Suppl):S40-3. PubMed ID: 24456684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptions towards disability among social work students in Israel: Development and validation of a new scale. Holler R; Werner S Health Soc Care Community; 2018 May; 26(3):423-432. PubMed ID: 29468782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supported decision-making and personal autonomy for persons with intellectual disabilities: article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Devi N J Law Med Ethics; 2013; 41(4):792-806, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 24446938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The UN Challenge to Guardianship and Surrogate Decision-Making. Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Mar; 52(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 35476360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of guardianship laws and surrogate decision-making practices in China, Japan, Thailand and Australia: a review by the Asia Consortium, International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce. Tsoh J; Peisah C; Narumoto J; Wongpakaran N; Wongpakaran T; O'Neill N; Jiang T; Ogano S; Mimura M; Kato Y; Chiu H Int Psychogeriatr; 2015 Jun; 27(6):1029-37. PubMed ID: 25573420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From Guardianship to Supported Decision-Making: Still Searching for True North? Carney T J Law Med; 2023 May; 30(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 37271952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Supported Decision Making With People at the Margins of Autonomy. Peterson A; Karlawish J; Largent E Am J Bioeth; 2021 Nov; 21(11):4-18. PubMed ID: 33372858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of guardianship on the quality of life of people with disabilities in Spain.]. González Casas D; Gallardo Peralta L; Rivera Álvarez JM; Mercado García E Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2021 Feb; 95():. PubMed ID: 33616087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guardianship determinations by judges, attorneys, and guardians. Gavisk M; Greene E Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 17559155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supported Decision-Making for People Living with Dementia: An Examination of Four Australian Guardianship Laws. Blake M; Stewart C; Castelli-Arnold P; Sinclair C J Law Med; 2021 Mar; 28(2):389-420. PubMed ID: 33768748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of the Supported Decision Making Inventory System. Shogren KA; Wehmeyer ML; Uyanik H; Heidrich M Intellect Dev Disabil; 2017 Dec; 55(6):432-439. PubMed ID: 29194029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new ball game: the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and assumptions in care for people with dementia. Smith A; Sullivan D J Law Med; 2012 Sep; 20(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 23156645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Social justice interdependence among students in counseling psychology training programs: Group actor-partner interdependence model of social justice attitudes, training program norms, advocacy intentions, and peer relationships. Keum BT; Miller MJ J Couns Psychol; 2020 Mar; 67(2):141-155. PubMed ID: 31613127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]