470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30614146)
1. Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas.
Zakhari N; Taccone MS; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Sinclair J; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Cron GO; Thornhill RE; McInnes MDF; Nguyen TB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):573-582. PubMed ID: 30614146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Arterial Spin-Labeling, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced, and DSC Perfusion Imaging in the Diagnosis of Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: A Prospective Study.
Nguyen TB; Zakhari N; Velasco Sandoval S; Guarnizo-Capera A; Alexios Gulak M; Woulfe J; Jansen G; Thornhill R; Majtenyi N; Cron GO
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):134-142. PubMed ID: 36702501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of FDG-PET/MRI, FDG-PET/CT, and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI in Differentiating Radiation Necrosis from Tumor Recurrence in Glioblastomas.
Hojjati M; Badve C; Garg V; Tatsuoka C; Rogers L; Sloan A; Faulhaber P; Ros PR; Wolansky LJ
J Neuroimaging; 2018 Jan; 28(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 28718993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brain Gliomas: Multicenter Standardized Assessment of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MR Images.
Anzalone N; Castellano A; Cadioli M; Conte GM; Cuccarini V; Bizzi A; Grimaldi M; Costa A; Grillea G; Vitali P; Aquino D; Terreni MR; Torri V; Erickson BJ; Caulo M
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):933-943. PubMed ID: 29361245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiating between Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-grade Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging with Histogram Analysis.
Murayama K; Nishiyama Y; Hirose Y; Abe M; Ohyu S; Ninomiya A; Fukuba T; Katada K; Toyama H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 17(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28515410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric Analysis Combining DSC-MR Perfusion and [18F]FET-PET is Superior to a Single Parameter Approach for Differentiation of Progressive Glioma from Radiation Necrosis.
Panholzer J; Malsiner-Walli G; Grün B; Kalev O; Sonnberger M; Pichler R
Clin Neuroradiol; 2024 Jun; 34(2):351-360. PubMed ID: 38157019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distinguishing Tumor Recurrence From Radiation Necrosis in Treated Glioblastoma Using Multiparametric MRI.
Feng A; Yuan P; Huang T; Li L; Lyu J
Acad Radiol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):1320-1331. PubMed ID: 34896001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.
Abrigo JM; Fountain DM; Provenzale JM; Law EK; Kwong JS; Hart MG; Tam WWS
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD011551. PubMed ID: 29357120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI characteristics to distinguish microcystic meningiomas from traditional Grade I meningiomas and high-grade gliomas.
Hussain NS; Moisi MD; Keogh B; McCullough BJ; Rostad S; Newell D; Gwinn R; Foltz G; Mayberg M; Aguedan B; Good V; Fouke SJ
J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 126(4):1220-1226. PubMed ID: 27285539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion-Weighted MR Imaging and
Qiao Z; Zhao X; Wang K; Zhang Y; Fan D; Yu T; Shen H; Chen Q; Ai L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 30655259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absolute CBV for the differentiation of recurrence and radionecrosis of brain metastases after gamma knife radiotherapy: a comparison with relative CBV.
Wang B; Zhao B; Zhang Y; Ge M; Zhao P; Na Sun ; Li C; Pang Q; Xu S; Liu Y
Clin Radiol; 2018 Aug; 73(8):758.e1-758.e7. PubMed ID: 29764622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of Tumor Immunohistochemistry with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and DSC-MRI Parameters in Patients with Gliomas.
Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Bezzina K; Perdrizet K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Thornhill RE; Zanette B; Cameron IG
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Dec; 37(12):2217-2223. PubMed ID: 27585700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of DSC- and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Preoperative Grading of Astrocytomas.
Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Perdrizet K; Bezzina K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Sinclair J; Thornhill RE; Foottit C; Zanette B; Cameron IG
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Nov; 36(11):2017-22. PubMed ID: 26228886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.
Xie T; Chen X; Fang J; Kang H; Xue W; Tong H; Cao P; Wang S; Yang Y; Zhang W
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1099-1111. PubMed ID: 28845594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor recurrence versus treatment effects in glioma: A comparative study of three dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging.
Xu Q; Liu Q; Ge H; Ge X; Wu J; Qu J; Xu K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e9332. PubMed ID: 29390403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined use of susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion weighted imaging to improve the accuracy of the differential diagnosis of recurrence and radionecrosis in high-grade glioma patients.
Kim TH; Yun TJ; Park CK; Kim TM; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Won JK; Park SH; Kim IH; Choi SH
Oncotarget; 2017 Mar; 8(12):20340-20353. PubMed ID: 27823971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease.
Seeger A; Braun C; Skardelly M; Paulsen F; Schittenhelm J; Ernemann U; Bisdas S
Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1557-65. PubMed ID: 24200483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis? A pilot comparison of arterial spin-labeled, dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced MRI, and FDG-PET imaging.
Ozsunar Y; Mullins ME; Kwong K; Hochberg FH; Ament C; Schaefer PW; Gonzalez RG; Lev MH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):282-90. PubMed ID: 20060750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uninterpretable Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Images in Patients with Post-Treatment Glioblastomas: Cross-Validation of Alternative Imaging Options.
Heo YJ; Kim HS; Park JE; Choi CG; Kim SJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136380. PubMed ID: 26296086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
