121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30614570)
1. Collection efficiency of liquid-based samplers for fungi in indoor air.
Chang CW; Ting YT; Horng YJ
Indoor Air; 2019 May; 29(3):380-389. PubMed ID: 30614570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applicability of a modified MCE filter method with Button Inhalable Sampler for monitoring personal bioaerosol inhalation exposure.
Xu Z; Xu H; Yao M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 May; 20(5):2963-72. PubMed ID: 23054771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods for quantifying Staphylococcus aureus in indoor air.
Chang CW; Wang LJ
Indoor Air; 2015 Feb; 25(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 24773454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
Li K
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
Lee KS; Bartlett KH; Brauer M; Stephens GM; Black WA; Teschke K
Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules.
Távora LG; Gambale W; Heins-Vaccari EM; Arriagada GL; Lacaz CS; Santos CR; Levin AS
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2003 May; 36(5):613-6. PubMed ID: 12715080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of high-volume air sampling equipment for viral aerosol sampling during emergency response.
Cooper C; Slagley J; Lohaus J; Escamilla E; Bliss C; Semler D; Felker D; Smith D; Ott D
J Emerg Manag; 2014; 12(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 24828912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air.
Chang CW; Chou FC
Indoor Air; 2011 Aug; 21(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 21198889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sampling efficiency and nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling with different bioaerosol samplers.
Bøifot KO; Skogan G; Dybwad M
Environ Monit Assess; 2024 May; 196(6):577. PubMed ID: 38795190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.
Mehta SK; Mishra SK; Pierson DL
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 May; 62(5):1835-8. PubMed ID: 11536729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of three impactor samplers for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations.
Méheust D; Gangneux JP; Cann PL
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 23799861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Particle counting and microbiological air sampling: results of the simultaneous use of both procedures in different types of hospital rooms.
Armadans-Gil L; Rodríguez-Garrido V; Campins-Martí M; Gil-Cuesta J; Vaqué-Rafart J
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2013 Apr; 31(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 22525830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Field testing of new aerosol sampling method with a porous curved surface as inlet.
Hauck BC; Grinshpun SA; Reponen A; Reponen T; Willeke K; Bornschein RL
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Oct; 58(10):713-9. PubMed ID: 9342831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of field performance of the Andersen N6 single stage and the SAS sampler for airborne fungal propagules.
Bellin P; Schillinger J
Indoor Air; 2001 Mar; 11(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11235232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancing bioaerosol sampling by Andersen impactors using mineral-oil-spread agar plate.
Xu Z; Wei K; Wu Y; Shen F; Chen Q; Li M; Yao M
PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56896. PubMed ID: 23460818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of human exposure to airborne fungi in agricultural confinements: personal inhalable sampling versus stationary sampling.
Adhikari A; Reponen T; Lee SA; Grinshpun SA
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2004; 11(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 15627336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing Performance of Spore Samplers in Monitoring Aeromycobiota and Fungal Plant Pathogen Diversity in Canada.
Chen W; Hambleton S; Seifert KA; Carisse O; Diarra MS; Peters RD; Lowe C; Chapados JT; Lévesque CA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 May; 84(9):. PubMed ID: 29475862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
