121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30614570)
21. Fungal spore source strength tester: laboratory evaluation of a new concept.
Sivasubramani SK; Niemeier RT; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
Sci Total Environ; 2004 Aug; 329(1-3):75-86. PubMed ID: 15262159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Study on the relationship between the concentration and type of fungal bio-aerosols at indoor and outdoor air in the Children's Medical Center, Tehran, Iran.
Karimpour Roshan S; Godini H; Nikmanesh B; Bakhshi H; Charsizadeh A
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jan; 191(2):48. PubMed ID: 30610385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The suitability of the IOM foam sampler for bioaerosol sampling in Occupational Environments.
Haatainen S; Laitinen J; Linnainmaa M; Reponen T; Kalliokoski P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jan; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19904652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Bacterial and fungal aerosols in the work environment of cleaners].
Gołofit-Szymczak M; Górny RL; Ławniczek-Wałczyk A; Cyprowski M; Stobnicka A
Med Pr; 2015; 66(6):779-91. PubMed ID: 26674165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the Results of Studies of Air Pollution Fungi Using the SAS Super 100, MAS 100, and Air IDEAL.
Łukaszuk C; Krajewska-Kułak E; Guzowski A; Kułak W; Kraszyńska B
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Jul; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 28726722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
Yao M; Mainelis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bacterial and fungal counts in hospital air: comparative yields for 4 sieve impactor air samplers with 2 culture media.
Gangneux JP; Robert-Gangneux F; Gicquel G; Tanquerel JJ; Chevrier S; Poisson M; Aupée M; Guiguen C
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 27(12):1405-8. PubMed ID: 17152043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative performance of impactor air samplers for quantification of fungal contamination.
Nesa D; Lortholary J; Bouakline A; Bordes M; Chandenier J; Derouin F; Gangneux JP
J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11170780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of three air samplers for the collection of four nebulized respiratory viruses - Collection of respiratory viruses from air.
Kutter JS; de Meulder D; Bestebroer TM; Mulders A; Fouchier RAM; Herfst S
Indoor Air; 2021 Nov; 31(6):1874-1885. PubMed ID: 34124803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can we use indoor fungi as bioindicators of indoor air quality? Historical perspectives and open questions.
Cabral JP
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4285-95. PubMed ID: 20655574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of a passive aerosol sampler to size-selective pump samplers in indoor environments.
Wagner J; Macher JM
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(5):630-9. PubMed ID: 14521436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A field comparison of four fungal aerosol sampling instruments: inter-sampler calibrations and caveats.
Lee KS; Teschke K; Brauer M; Bartlett KH
Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 15330797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices.
Godish D; Godish T
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 18085480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
Kenny LC; Bowry A; Crook B; Stancliffe JD
Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sampling of high concentrations of airborne fungi.
Blomquist G; Ström G; Strömquist LH
Scand J Work Environ Health; 1984 Apr; 10(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 6382591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bioaerosol assessment in naturally ventilated historical library building with restricted personnel access.
Harkawy A; Górny RL; Ogierman L; Wlazło A; Ławniczek-Wałczyk A; Niesler A
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2011; 18(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 22216807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Air sampling of Aspergillus fumigatus and other thermotolerant fungi: comparative performance of the Sartorius MD8 airport and the Merck MAS-100 portable bioaerosol sampler.
Engelhart S; Glasmacher A; Simon A; Exner M
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 Dec; 210(6):733-739. PubMed ID: 17142101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance Evaluation and Validation of Air Samplers To Detect Aerosolized Coxiella burnetii.
Abeykoon AMH; Poon M; Firestone SM; Stevenson MA; Wiethoelter AK; Vincent GA
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Oct; 10(5):e0065522. PubMed ID: 36073825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fungal monitoring of the indoor air of the Museo de La Plata Herbarium, Argentina.
Mallo AC; Elíades LA; Nitiu DS; Saparrat MCN
Rev Iberoam Micol; 2017; 34(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 28214272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
