172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30614665)
1. Comparison of GnRH agonist versus luteal estradiol GnRH antagonist protocol using transdermal testosterone in poor responders.
Fàbregues F; Solernou R; Ferreri J; Guimerá M; Peralta S; Casals G; Peñarrubia J; Creus M; Manau D
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2019 Apr; 23(2):130-136. PubMed ID: 30614665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of estrogen priming through luteal phase and stimulation phase in poor responders in in-vitro fertilization.
Chang EM; Han JE; Won HJ; Kim YS; Yoon TK; Lee WS
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2012 Mar; 29(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 22160464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of luteal estradiol patch and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for patients with a history of poor in vitro fertilization outcomes.
Weitzman VN; Engmann L; DiLuigi A; Maier D; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 18675961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders.
Lainas TG; Sfontouris IA; Venetis CA; Lainas GT; Zorzovilis IZ; Tarlatzis BC; Kolibianakis EM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 26307091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the standard GnRH antagonist protocol and the luteal phase estradiol/GnRH antagonist priming protocol in poor ovarian responders.
Mutlu MF; Mutlu İ; Erdem M; Güler İ; Erdem A
Turk J Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 47(2):470-475. PubMed ID: 28425233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improve the pregnancy outcome in Bologna poor responders? a randomized clinical trial.
Ashrafi M; Arabipoor A; Yahyaei A; Zolfaghari Z; Ghaffari F
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):124. PubMed ID: 30593268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial of microdose leuprolide acetate protocol versus luteal phase ganirelix protocol in predicted poor responders.
DiLuigi AJ; Engmann L; Schmidt DW; Benadiva CA; Nulsen JC
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(8):2531-3. PubMed ID: 21324455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GnRH antagonist and letrozole co-treatment in diminished ovarian reserve patients: a proof-of-concept study.
Olgan S; Humaidan P
Reprod Biol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 28173995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle.
Kahraman K; Berker B; Atabekoglu CS; Sonmezer M; Cetinkaya E; Aytac R; Satiroglu H
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2437-44. PubMed ID: 18555238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A mild ovarian stimulation strategy in women with poor ovarian reserve undergoing IVF: a multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial.
Youssef MA; van Wely M; Al-Inany H; Madani T; Jahangiri N; Khodabakhshi S; Alhalabi M; Akhondi M; Ansaripour S; Tokhmechy R; Zarandi L; Rizk A; El-Mohamedy M; Shaeer E; Khattab M; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 27836979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study.
Wei LH; Ma WH; Tang N; Wei JH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 26927248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.
Buendgen NK; Schultze-Mosgau A; Cordes T; Diedrich K; Griesinger G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 23545834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted conception.
Al-Inany H; Aboulghar M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (4):CD001750. PubMed ID: 11687120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of GnRH antagonist fixed protocol and GnRH agonists long protocol in infertile patients with normal ovarian reserve function in their first in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle].
Yang S; Chen XN; Qiao J; Liu P; Li R; Chen GA; Ma CH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 47(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 22781108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cumulative live birth rates per oocytes retrieved cycle: evaluation of clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI].
Wu CX; Zhang T; Shu L; Huang J; Diao FY; Ding W; Gao Y; Wang W; Mao YD; Cui YG; Liu JY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):160-166. PubMed ID: 29609229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Letrozole and gonadotropins versus luteal estradiol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with a prior low response to ovarian stimulation.
Elassar A; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2330-4. PubMed ID: 21514582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Delayed Start Versus Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Pretreated With Estradiol in Luteal Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Maged AM; Nada AM; Abohamila F; Hashem AT; Mostafa WA; Elzayat AR
Reprod Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1627-31. PubMed ID: 26045549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus flexible antagonist versus clomiphene citrate regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial.
Schimberni M; Ciardo F; Schimberni M; Giallonardo A; De Pratti V; Sbracia M
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2016 Oct; 20(20):4354-4361. PubMed ID: 27831635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Growth Hormone Supplementation in the Luteal Phase Before Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare Protocol for In Vitro Fertilization.
Dunne C; Seethram K; Roberts J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Sep; 37(9):810-815. PubMed ID: 26605451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Luteal-phase protocol in poor ovarian response: a comparative study with an antagonist protocol.
Wu Y; Zhao FC; Sun Y; Liu PS
J Int Med Res; 2017 Dec; 45(6):1731-1738. PubMed ID: 28661216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
