236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30614730)
1. Beyond harmfulness and impurity: Moral wrongness as a violation of relational motivations.
Tepe B; Aydinli-Karakulak A
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Aug; 117(2):310-337. PubMed ID: 30614730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linking Judging Moral to Acting Moral: A Relational Motivations Approach to Judging and Practicing Covid-19 Behaviors.
Tepe B; Karakulak A
Psychol Rep; 2023 Apr; 126(2):835-855. PubMed ID: 34933626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment.
Simpson A; Laham SM; Fiske AP
J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(6):594-609. PubMed ID: 26751010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments.
Earp BD; McLoughlin KL; Monrad JT; Clark MS; Crockett MJ
Nat Commun; 2021 Oct; 12(1):5776. PubMed ID: 34599174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. People respond with different moral emotions to violations in different relational models: A cross-cultural comparison.
Sunar D; Cesur S; Piyale ZE; Tepe B; Biten AF; Hill CT; Koç Y
Emotion; 2021 Jun; 21(4):693-706. PubMed ID: 32191085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality.
Rai TS; Fiske AP
Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 21244187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Judgments of moral responsibility and wrongness for intentional and accidental harm and purity violations.
Parkinson M; Byrne RMJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 28059634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Harm concerns predict moral judgments of suicide: comment on Rottman, Kelemen and Young (2014).
Gray K
Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):329-31. PubMed ID: 25023146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are Children Perceived to Be Morally Exceptional? Different Sets of Psychological Variables Predict Adults' Moral Judgments About Adults and Young Children.
White CJM; Schaller M
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1147-1162. PubMed ID: 29561230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imagining wrong: Fictitious contexts mitigate condemnation of harm more than impurity.
Sabo JS; Giner-Sorolla R
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jan; 146(1):134-153. PubMed ID: 28054817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical Attractiveness Biases Judgments Pertaining to the Moral Domain of Purity.
Klebl C; Rhee JJ; Greenaway KH; Luo Y; Bastian B
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Feb; 49(2):282-295. PubMed ID: 34964373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Within your rights: Dissociating wrongness and permissibility in moral judgement.
Murray S; Jiménez-Leal W; Amaya S
Br J Soc Psychol; 2024 Jan; 63(1):340-361. PubMed ID: 37694975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity.
Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 May; 48(5):766-781. PubMed ID: 34247528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Harmful situations, impure people: an attribution asymmetry across moral domains.
Chakroff A; Young L
Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():30-7. PubMed ID: 25490126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Specks of Dirt and Tons of Pain: Dosage Distinguishes Impurity From Harm.
Rottman J; Young L
Psychol Sci; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1151-1160. PubMed ID: 31242081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Omissions and byproducts across moral domains.
DeScioli P; Asao K; Kurzban R
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46963. PubMed ID: 23071678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Social perception in moral judgments of interpersonal transgressions.
Adams GS; O'Connor KS; Belmi P
Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Apr; 44():177-181. PubMed ID: 34688999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morals matter in economic games.
Brodbeck FC; Kugler KG; Reif JA; Maier MA
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81558. PubMed ID: 24358115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer? No evidence for perceptual fluency effects on moral wrongness ratings.
Nadarevic L; Kroneisen M
Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104156. PubMed ID: 31981850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
