115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3061501)
1. [Comparison of echography and x-ray computed tomography in cancer of the ovary].
Normand F; Bruneton JN; Vigne E; Balu-Maestro C; Ettore F; Frenay M
Bull Cancer; 1988; 75(9):889-93. PubMed ID: 3061501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology.
Castellucci P; Perrone AM; Picchio M; Ghi T; Farsad M; Nanni C; Messa C; Meriggiola MC; Pelusi G; Al-Nahhas A; Rubello D; Fazio F; Fanti S
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Aug; 28(8):589-95. PubMed ID: 17625380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective study of computed tomography and ultrasound in the detection and staging of pelvic masses.
Sanders RC; McNeil BJ; Finberg HJ; Hessel SJ; Siegelman SS; Adams DF; Alderson PO; Abrams HL
Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):439-42. PubMed ID: 6849090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Value of x-ray computed tomography in the monitoring of cancer of the ovary. Apropos of 69 cases].
Giwerc M; Masselot J; George M; Rochard F; Haie C
J Radiol; 1986 Nov; 67(11):769-74. PubMed ID: 3806463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging techniques for the evaluation of ovarian cancer.
Fischerova D; Burgetova A
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jul; 28(5):697-720. PubMed ID: 24846098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The clinical value of computed tomography and lymphography in detecting lymph node metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer.
La Fianza A; Campani R; Dore R; Babilonti L; Tateo S
Rofo; 1992 Aug; 157(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 1515625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of diagnostic value of CT scan, physical examination and ultrasound based on pathological findings in patients with pelvic masses.
Firoozabadi RD; Karimi Zarchi M; Mansurian HR; Moghadam BR; Teimoori S; Naseri A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1745-7. PubMed ID: 22126557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of the results of preoperative studies with imaging procedures with the surgical status of ovarian cancer].
Simon WE; Lenz M; Storz A; Straussinsky G; Hirsch HA
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Jun; 49(6):568-72. PubMed ID: 2663620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Imaging diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with computerized tomography and sonography].
Hamm B; Albig M; Römer T; Felix R; Wolf KJ
Rofo; 1987 Jun; 146(6):684-8. PubMed ID: 3037640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Computerized tomography and MR tomography in diagnosis of ovarian tumors].
Hamm B
Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):362-9. PubMed ID: 7938483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography in the evaluation of gynecologic pelvic masses.
Walsh JW; Rosenfield AT; Jaffe CC; Schwartz PE; Simeone J; Dembner AG; Taylor KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Dec; 131(6):955-60. PubMed ID: 104597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of CT in the evaluation of ovarian malignancy.
Amendola MA
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1985; 24(4):329-68. PubMed ID: 3896652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Role of X-ray CT in the evaluation of extension of ovarian cancer].
Saito T
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Jan; 43(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 1997621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [X-ray computed tomography compared to surgery in cancer of the ovary].
Taïeb S; Bonodeau F; Leblanc E; Vennin P; Fournier C; Besson P
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998 Sep; 26(9):I-VIII. PubMed ID: 9823697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Imaging procedures in diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma].
Häusler G; Schurz B
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1996; 146(1-2):8-10. PubMed ID: 8835488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Pelvic gynecological cancers. Is hepatic echography useful?].
Bruneton JN; Raffaelli C; Balu-Maestro C; Marcy PY; Melia P
J Radiol; 1994 Mar; 75(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 8176678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic value of PET/CT is similar to that of conventional MRI and even better for detecting small peritoneal implants in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
Sanli Y; Turkmen C; Bakir B; Iyibozkurt C; Ozel S; Has D; Yilmaz E; Topuz S; Yavuz E; Unal SN; Mudun A
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 May; 33(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 22357440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Peritoneal carcinosis in ovarian cancer: conventional imaging (CT-scan and MRI)].
Bailly C; Bailly-Glatre A; Alfidja A; Vincent C; Dauplat J; Pomel C
Bull Cancer; 2009 Dec; 96(12):1155-62. PubMed ID: 19959422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses.
Medl M; Kulenkampff KJ; Stiskal M; Peters-Engl C; Leodolter S; Czembirek H
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(3):1123-5. PubMed ID: 7645935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epithelial tumors of the ovary: CT findings and correlation with US.
Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Sciot C; Bazot M; Guinet C; Prévot S; Hugol D; Laromiguiere M; Truc JB; Poitout P
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):811-8. PubMed ID: 1994423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
