BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30615674)

  • 1. Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design.
    Kim HS; Yu DS; Cho HG; Moon BY; Kim SY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210387. PubMed ID: 30615674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial lengths of myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic children.
    Dogan M; Elgin U; Sen E; Tekin K; Yilmazbas P
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):335-340. PubMed ID: 29285706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relatively anterior lens position in primary angle-closure glaucoma eyes with long axial length.
    Chen J; Zhang Y; Huang Y; Ng TK; Huang C
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 71(5):1941-1947. PubMed ID: 37203062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the anatomic and refractive differences in hyperopic anisometropia.
    Palamar M; Degirmenci C; Biler ED; Egrilmez S; Uretmen O; Yagci A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 36(6):881-886. PubMed ID: 26887566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optical 'dampening' of the refractive error to axial length ratio: implications for outcome measures in myopia control studies.
    Cruickshank FE; Logan NS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):290-297. PubMed ID: 29691929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Intraocular lens power calculation for high myopic eyes with cataract: comparison of three formulas].
    Zhu XJ; He WW; Du Y; Qian DJ; Dai JH; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 53(4):260-265. PubMed ID: 28412798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship of axial length to cycloplegic refraction and keratometry in amblyopic eyes of hyperopic children.
    Khan AO
    J AAPOS; 2012 Feb; 16(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 22370665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender differences in refractive prediction in refractive lens exchange surgery.
    Lundqvist O; Westin O; Koskela T; Behndig A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 25264119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the time of day on axial length and choroidal thickness changes to hyperopic and myopic defocus in human eyes.
    Moderiano D; Do M; Hobbs S; Lam V; Sarin S; Alonso-Caneiro D; Chakraborty R
    Exp Eye Res; 2019 May; 182():125-136. PubMed ID: 30926510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The analysis of refractive error of long axial high myopic eyes after IOL implantation].
    Zheng Q; Zhao Z; Lian H; Zhao Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 51(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 26081231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the ocular refractive components: the Reykjavik Eye Study.
    Olsen T; Arnarsson A; Sasaki H; Sasaki K; Jonasson F
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Jun; 85(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 17286626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of ocular axial length with optometric parameters is not accurate.
    Galvis V; Tello A; Rey JJ; Serrano Gomez S; Prada AM
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2022 Jun; 45(3):101448. PubMed ID: 33975785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculation of Axial Length Using a Single Group Refractive Index versus Using Different Refractive Indices for Each Ocular Segment: Theoretical Study and Refractive Outcomes.
    Wang L; Cao D; Weikert MP; Koch DD
    Ophthalmology; 2019 May; 126(5):663-670. PubMed ID: 30605743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Correlation between refraction and ocular biometry].
    Touzeau O; Allouch C; Borderie V; Kopito R; Laroche L
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2003 Apr; 26(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12843892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of the SRK/T formula using A-Scan ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification in eyes with short and long axial lengths.
    Karabela Y; Eliacik M; Kaya F
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 16():96. PubMed ID: 27391470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distribution of ocular biometry in young Chinese eyes: The Anyang University Students Eye Study.
    Sun Y; Wei S; Li S; Cao K; Hu J; Yang X; Lin C; An W; Guo J; Li H; Fu J; Wang N
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 99(6):621-627. PubMed ID: 33326192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Distinct Biometric Features of High Myopia Compared to Moderate Myopia.
    Chung HJ; Park CK
    Curr Eye Res; 2016 Dec; 41(12):1580-1583. PubMed ID: 27336460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interocular difference in crystalline lens morphology in children and adolescents with unilateral high myopia.
    Zhang Y; Zhang J; Jin A; Tan X; Ohno-Matsui K; Han X; Luo L; Liu Y
    Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2024; 13(1):100001. PubMed ID: 38383078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender.
    Zadnik K; Manny RE; Yu JA; Mitchell GL; Cotter SA; Quiralte JC; Shipp M; Friedman NE; Kleinstein R; Walker TW; Jones LA; Moeschberger ML; Mutti DO;
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 80(3):226-36. PubMed ID: 12637834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of the Haigis and SRK/T Formulas in Eyes Longer than 29.0 mm and the Influence of Central Corneal Keratometry Reading.
    Zhang Z; Miao Y; Fang X; Luo Q; Wang Y
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Nov; 43(11):1316-1321. PubMed ID: 29958004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.