331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30616540)
1. Unbiased data mining identifies cell cycle transcripts that predict non-indolent Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.
Johnston WL; Catton CN; Swallow CJ
BMC Urol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30616540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Geybels MS; Wright JL; Bibikova M; Klotzle B; Fan JB; Zhao S; Feng Z; Ostrander EA; Lin DW; Nelson PS; Stanford JL
Clin Epigenetics; 2016; 8():97. PubMed ID: 27651837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gene expression signature of Gleason score is associated with prostate cancer outcomes in a radical prostatectomy cohort.
Jhun MA; Geybels MS; Wright JL; Kolb S; April C; Bibikova M; Ostrander EA; Fan JB; Feng Z; Stanford JL
Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(26):43035-43047. PubMed ID: 28496006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discovery of serum protein biomarkers for prostate cancer progression by proteomic analysis.
Al-Ruwaili JA; Larkin SE; Zeidan BA; Taylor MG; Adra CN; Aukim-Hastie CL; Townsend PA
Cancer Genomics Proteomics; 2010; 7(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 20335524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Random forest-based modelling to detect biomarkers for prostate cancer progression.
Toth R; Schiffmann H; Hube-Magg C; Büscheck F; Höflmayer D; Weidemann S; Lebok P; Fraune C; Minner S; Schlomm T; Sauter G; Plass C; Assenov Y; Simon R; Meiners J; Gerhäuser C
Clin Epigenetics; 2019 Oct; 11(1):148. PubMed ID: 31640781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate extracellular vesicles in patient plasma as a liquid biopsy platform for prostate cancer using nanoscale flow cytometry.
Biggs CN; Siddiqui KM; Al-Zahrani AA; Pardhan S; Brett SI; Guo QQ; Yang J; Wolf P; Power NE; Durfee PN; MacMillan CD; Townson JL; Brinker JC; Fleshner NE; Izawa JI; Chambers AF; Chin JL; Leong HS
Oncotarget; 2016 Feb; 7(8):8839-49. PubMed ID: 26814433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Markers of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition reflect tumor biology according to patient age and Gleason score in prostate cancer.
Jędroszka D; Orzechowska M; Hamouz R; Górniak K; Bednarek AK
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188842. PubMed ID: 29206234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contemporary grading for prostate cancer: implications for patient care.
Brimo F; Montironi R; Egevad L; Erbersdobler A; Lin DW; Nelson JB; Rubin MA; van der Kwast T; Amin M; Epstein JI
Eur Urol; 2013 May; 63(5):892-901. PubMed ID: 23092544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interrogation of ERG gene rearrangements in prostate cancer identifies a prognostic 10-gene signature with relevant implication to patients' clinical outcome.
Bismar TA; Alshalalfa M; Petersen LF; Teng LH; Gerke T; Bakkar A; Al-Mami A; Liu S; Dolph M; Mucci LA; Alhajj R
BJU Int; 2014 Feb; 113(2):309-19. PubMed ID: 24006850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy.
Klein EA; Yousefi K; Haddad Z; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Stephenson AJ; Li J; Kattan MW; Magi-Galluzzi C; Davicioni E
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):778-86. PubMed ID: 25466945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expression of cell cycle-regulated genes and prostate cancer prognosis in a population-based cohort.
Rubicz R; Zhao S; April C; Wright JL; Kolb S; Coleman I; Lin DW; Nelson PS; Ostrander EA; Feng Z; Fan JB; Stanford JL
Prostate; 2015 Sep; 75(13):1354-62. PubMed ID: 25990700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oncological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on New Gleason Grouping System: A Validation Study From University of Southern California With 3,755 Cases.
Djaladat H; Amini E; Xu W; Cai J; Daneshmand S; Lieskovsky G
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(7):743-748. PubMed ID: 28144967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A four-gene transcript score to predict metastatic-lethal progression in men treated for localized prostate cancer: Development and validation studies.
Cheng A; Zhao S; FitzGerald LM; Wright JL; Kolb S; Karnes RJ; Jenkins RB; Davicioni E; Ostrander EA; Feng Z; Fan JB; Dai JY; Stanford JL
Prostate; 2019 Oct; 79(14):1589-1596. PubMed ID: 31376183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
