These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30616709)

  • 21. Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor to enhance the mitigation of seasonal losses due to heat stress in pigs.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Bradford HL; Gray KA; Huang Y; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5004-5013. PubMed ID: 28046178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.
    Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):909-19. PubMed ID: 27065253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals for scarcely recorded feed intake in pigs.
    Jibrila I; Ten Napel J; Vandenplas J; Bergsma R; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 May; 140(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 36637041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genomic prediction for crossbred performance using metafounders.
    van Grevenhof EM; Vandenplas J; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 97(2):548-558. PubMed ID: 30423111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
    Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1513-1522. PubMed ID: 30726939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marker genotyping error effects on genomic predictions under different genetic architectures.
    Akbarpour T; Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N; Shadparvar AA
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2021 Jan; 296(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 32995954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of breeding values in small genotyped populations using different sources of external information-A simulation study.
    Andonov S; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Pocrnic I; Tsuruta S; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):395-401. PubMed ID: 28341049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):59. PubMed ID: 28747171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficient large-scale single-step evaluations and indirect genomic prediction of genotyped selection candidates.
    Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Darbaghshahi SN; Evans R; Calus MPL; Veerkamp R; Cromie A; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):37. PubMed ID: 37291510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dissecting genetic trends to understand breeding practices in livestock: a maternal pig line example.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Nov; 53(1):89. PubMed ID: 34837954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genomic selection in American mink (Neovison vison) using a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction model for size and quality traits graded on live mink.
    Villumsen TM; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Asp T; Lund MS
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 99(1):. PubMed ID: 33515480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genomic prediction for growth and reproduction traits in pig using an admixed reference population.
    Song H; Zhang J; Jiang Y; Gao H; Tang S; Mi S; Yu F; Meng Q; Xiao W; Zhang Q; Ding X
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3415-3424. PubMed ID: 28805914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genomic clustering helps to improve prediction in a multibreed population.
    Ventura R; Larmer S; Schenkel FS; Miller SP; Sullivan P
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1844-56. PubMed ID: 27285682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.
    Bussiman F; Chen CY; Holl J; Bermann M; Legarra A; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37584978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Gowane GR; Lee SH; Clark S; Moghaddar N; Al-Mamun HA; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Sep; 136(5):390-407. PubMed ID: 31215699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of genomic evaluation with weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction for milk production traits, udder type traits, and somatic cell scores in French dairy goats.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granie C
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3142-3154. PubMed ID: 30712939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. First Genomic Prediction of Single-Step Models in Large Yellow Croaker.
    Wang J; Bai Y; Zou X; Li C; Yang J; Ke Q; Zhao J; Zhou T; Xu P
    Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2023 Aug; 25(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 37410311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.