631 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30616906)
1. Sub-muscular plane for augmentation mammoplasty patients increases silicone gel implant rupture rate.
Hadad E; Klein D; Seligman Y; Wiser I; Heller L
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Mar; 72(3):419-423. PubMed ID: 30616906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Poly Implant Prothèse and Rofil Substandard Breast Implant Explantations from a Large German Single Centre from 2011 to 2014: A Comparative Study.
Billner M; Wirthmann A; Reif S; Rieger UM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 40(4):507-13. PubMed ID: 27286854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to "dual-plane" positioning: technique and outcomes.
Spear SL; Carter ME; Ganz JC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Aug; 112(2):456-66. PubMed ID: 12900603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does Implant Surface Texture Affect the Risk of Capsular Contracture in Subglandular Breast Augmentation and Breast Augmentation-Mastopexy?
Lista F; Austin RE; Saheb-Al-Zamani M; Ahmad J
Aesthet Surg J; 2020 Apr; 40(5):499-512. PubMed ID: 31529039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of Capsular Contracture in Cases of Silicone Gel Breast Implant Rupture with Use of Pulse Lavage and Open Capsulotomy.
Lam MC; Walgenbach-Brünagel G; Pryalukhin A; Vorhold J; Pech T; Kalff JC; Kristiansen G; Walgenbach KJ
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(5):1173-1185. PubMed ID: 31367775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary (3 years) experience with smooth wall silicone gel implants for primary breast augmentation.
Seify H; Sullivan K; Hester TR
Ann Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 54(3):231-5; discussion 235. PubMed ID: 15725819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion.
Pereira LH; Sterodimas A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):752-9. PubMed ID: 19597863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration.
Khan UD
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19841968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants.
Stevens WG; Pacella SJ; Gear AJ; Freeman ME; McWhorter C; Tenenbaum MJ; Stoker DA
Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19083592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PIP silicone breast implants: rupture rates based on the explantation of 676 implants in a single surgeon series.
Quaba O; Quaba A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1182-7. PubMed ID: 23725742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients.
Lista F; Tutino R; Khan A; Ahmad J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 23584627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complete submuscular breast augmentation: 650 cases managed using an alternative surgical technique.
Hendricks H
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 17235463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes analysis of patients undergoing autoaugmentation after breast implant removal.
Gurunluoglu R; Sacak B; Arton J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):304-315. PubMed ID: 23897329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Muscle-splitting, subglandular, and partial submuscular augmentation mammoplasties: a 12-year retrospective analysis of 2026 primary cases.
Khan UD
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):290-302. PubMed ID: 23354762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging of breast implant and implant-associated complications: Capsular contracture and intra- or extracapsular rupture.
Georgieva M; Kammerer S; Prantl L; Jung F; Stroszczynski C; Jung EM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 76(2):221-231. PubMed ID: 32925022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Silicone breast implant rupture is more prevalent in the dominant limb side: A retrospective cohort study.
Hadad E; Sualhi I; Legarda C; Seligman Y; Sorkin A; Dor O; Menashe S; Heller L; Wiser I
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():126-132. PubMed ID: 37011442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk Factor Analysis for Capsular Contracture: A 10-Year Sientra Study Using Round, Smooth, and Textured Implants for Breast Augmentation.
Calobrace MB; Stevens WG; Capizzi PJ; Cohen R; Godinez T; Beckstrand M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):20S-28S. PubMed ID: 29595715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
