These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30617746)

  • 1. Probability matching does not decrease under cognitive load: A preregistered failure to replicate.
    Schulze C; James G; Koehler DJ; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Apr; 47(3):511-518. PubMed ID: 30617746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Taking the easy way out? Increasing implementation effort reduces probability maximizing under cognitive load.
    Schulze C; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):806-18. PubMed ID: 26884088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The smart potential behind probability matching.
    Gaissmaier W; Schooler LJ
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 19019351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encoding and choice in the task span paradigm.
    Reiman KM; Weaver SM; Arrington CM
    Psychol Res; 2015 Mar; 79(2):267-81. PubMed ID: 24627168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of cognitive appraisal and mental workload factors on performance in an arithmetic task.
    Galy E; Mélan C
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2015 Dec; 40(4):313-25. PubMed ID: 26205469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferred, but not objective temperature predicts working memory depletion.
    Sellaro R; Hommel B; Manaï M; Colzato LS
    Psychol Res; 2015 Mar; 79(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 24652342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Executive control and working memory are involved in sub-second repetitive motor timing.
    Holm L; Karampela O; Ullén F; Madison G
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):787-798. PubMed ID: 27885405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of working memory load on the SNARC effect: Maybe tasks have a word to say.
    Deng Z; Chen Y; Zhu X; Li Y
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):428-441. PubMed ID: 27909981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No Effect of Commercial Cognitive Training on Brain Activity, Choice Behavior, or Cognitive Performance.
    Kable JW; Caulfield MK; Falcone M; McConnell M; Bernardo L; Parthasarathi T; Cooper N; Ashare R; Audrain-McGovern J; Hornik R; Diefenbach P; Lee FJ; Lerman C
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(31):7390-7402. PubMed ID: 28694338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Better cognitive efficiency is associated with increased experimental anxiety.
    Grillon C; Lago T; Stahl S; Beale A; Balderston N; Ernst M
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Aug; 57(8):e13559. PubMed ID: 32180239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-reported strategies in decisions under risk: role of feedback, reasoning abilities, executive functions, short-term-memory, and working memory.
    Schiebener J; Brand M
    Cogn Process; 2015 Nov; 16(4):401-16. PubMed ID: 26289475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taxing executive processes does not necessarily increase impulsive decision making.
    Franco-Watkins AM; Rickard TC; Pashler H
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 20178926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Free choice tasks as random generation tasks: an investigation through working memory manipulations.
    Naefgen C; Janczyk M
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2263-2275. PubMed ID: 29850924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. It's the thought that counts: examining the task-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on executive function.
    Gill J; Shah-Basak PP; Hamilton R
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 25465291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unconscious biases in task choices depend on conscious expectations.
    González-García C; Tudela P; Ruz M
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():44-56. PubMed ID: 26280375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic imitation remains unaffected under cognitive load.
    Ramsey R; Darda KM; Downing PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):601-615. PubMed ID: 30945910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Executive working memory involved in the learning of contextual cueing effect.
    Chen M; Wang C; Sclodnick B; Zhao G; Liu X
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Nov; 237(11):3059-3070. PubMed ID: 31538226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taxing cognitive capacities reduces choice consistency rather than preference: A model-based test.
    Olschewski S; Rieskamp J; Scheibehenne B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Apr; 147(4):462-484. PubMed ID: 29698025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of 1 mA and 2 mA transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory performance in healthy participants.
    Papazova I; Strube W; Wienert A; Henning B; Schwippel T; Fallgatter AJ; Padberg F; Falkai P; Plewnia C; Hasan A
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Aug; 83():102959. PubMed ID: 32502908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.