These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30618313)

  • 21. Four earplugs in search of a rating system.
    Franks JR; Murphy WJ; Johnson JL; Harris DA
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 10890730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Tester to Evaluate the Correct Placement of Earplugs.
    Kozlowski E; Mlynski R; Morzynski L; Swidzinski A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold.
    Berger EH; Kerivan JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 6886201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The efficacy of earplugs at a major hazard facility.
    Lee KH; Benke G; Mckenzie D
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Mar; 45(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 35023076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Training on hearing protector insertion improves noise attenuation.
    Samelli AG; Rocha CH; Theodósio P; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF
    Codas; 2015; 27(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 26691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A trail of individual education for hearing protection with an instrument that measures the noise attenuation effect of wearing earplugs.
    Tsukada T; Sakakibara H
    Ind Health; 2008 Aug; 46(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 18716388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The insertion loss distribution function of an ear plug, and its implications for the ear plug acceptability.
    Lenzuni P; Annesi D; Nataletti P
    Noise Health; 2020; 22(105):35-45. PubMed ID: 33380615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Audiological implications of earplugs used for the prevention of aural exostoses.
    Srinivasan J; Reddy VM; Flanagan PM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 269(3):787-90. PubMed ID: 21822855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The objective measurement of individual earplug field performance.
    Voix J; Laville F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3722-32. PubMed ID: 19507954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A clinical trial of active hearing protection for orchestral musicians.
    O'Brien I; Driscoll T; Williams W; Ackermann B
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(7):450-9. PubMed ID: 24433326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Assessment of the impulse noise attenuation by earplugs in metalworking processes].
    Mlyński R; Kozlowski E
    Med Pr; 2014; 65(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 25090849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.
    Murphy WJ; Franks JR; Berger EH; Behar A; Casali JG; Dixon-Ernst C; Krieg EF; Mozo BT; Royster JD; Royster LH; Simon SD; Stephenson C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):311-23. PubMed ID: 14759024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices.
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jun; 79(6):1655-87. PubMed ID: 3522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved hearing protector attenuation through the use of a lubricant.
    Ryan TJ; Meier RS; Tatarka A
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Nov; 14(11):931-937. PubMed ID: 28763289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing thresholds, threshold repeatability, and attenuation values for passive noise-reducing earphone enclosures.
    Frank T; Greer AC; Magistro DM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Nov; 58(11):772-8. PubMed ID: 9373922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Noise attenuation of earplugs as measured by hREAT and F-MIRE methods in a Japanese metal manufacturing plant.
    Kabe I; Kochi T; Tsuruoka H; Tonegawa T; Denda I; Nonogi M; Tsuiki H; Mizoue T; Tanaka S
    J Occup Health; 2012; 54(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 22673642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improvements in sound attenuation performance with earplugs following checklist-based self-practice.
    Takahashi K; Kawaniai S; Inoue J; Horie S
    J UOEH; 2011 Dec; 33(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 22259832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.