297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30618357)
1. Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study.
Atkin W; Cross AJ; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Pearson S; Wooldrage K; Brown J; Lucas F; Prendergast A; Marchevsky N; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Skrobanski H; Kerrison R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran S
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jan; 23(1):1-84. PubMed ID: 30618357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) versus colonoscopy for surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study.
Cross AJ; Wooldrage K; Robbins EC; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Stenson I; Prendergast A; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran SP; Atkin WS
Gut; 2019 Sep; 68(9):1642-1652. PubMed ID: 30538097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.
Grobbee EJ; Wisse PHA; Schreuders EH; van Roon A; van Dam L; Zauber AG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bramer W; Berhane S; Deeks JJ; Steyerberg EW; van Leerdam ME; Spaander MC; Kuipers EJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Jun; 6(6):CD009276. PubMed ID: 35665911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Faecal immunochemical tests to triage patients with lower abdominal symptoms for suspected colorectal cancer referrals in primary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; Corro Ramos I; Lang S; Luyendijk M; Zaim R; Stirk L; Al M; Armstrong N; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2017 May; 21(33):1-234. PubMed ID: 28643629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
Murphy J; Halloran S; Gray A
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017186. PubMed ID: 29079605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study.
Schreuders EH; Grobbee EJ; Nieuwenburg SAV; Kapidzic A; van Roon AHC; van Vuuren AJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spijker WWJ; Izelaar K; Bruno MJ; Kuipers EJ; Spaander MCW
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Aug; 4(8):622-631. PubMed ID: 31196734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of two faecal immunochemical tests for the detection of advanced neoplasia at different positivity thresholds: a cross-sectional study of the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening programme.
de Klerk CM; Wieten E; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bossuyt PM; Spaander MC; Dekker E
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Feb; 4(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 30497962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-sample quantitative and two-sample qualitative faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in China.
Wang L; Chen H; Zhu Y; Lu M; Wang Y; Chen X; Ma W; Du L; Chen W
BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e059754. PubMed ID: 35589365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of a quantitative faecal immunochemical test vs. symptoms suspected for colorectal cancer in patients referred for colonoscopy.
Tsapournas G; Hellström PM; Cao Y; Olsson LI
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):184-192. PubMed ID: 31906738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Faecal haemoglobin can define risk of colorectal neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer.
Digby J; Cleary S; Gray L; Datt P; Goudie DR; Steele RJC; Strachan JA; Humphries A; Fraser CG; Mowat C
United European Gastroenterol J; 2020 Jun; 8(5):559-566. PubMed ID: 32213041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Cross AJ; Robbins EC; Pack K; Stenson I; Kirby PL; Patel B; Rutter MD; Veitch AM; Saunders BP; Little M; Gray A; Duffy SW; Wooldrage K
Health Technol Assess; 2022 May; 26(26):1-156. PubMed ID: 35635015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased uptake and improved outcomes of bowel cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: results from a pilot study within the national screening programme in England.
Moss S; Mathews C; Day TJ; Smith S; Seaman HE; Snowball J; Halloran SP
Gut; 2017 Sep; 66(9):1631-1644. PubMed ID: 27267903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using a hypothetical scenario to assess public preferences for colorectal surveillance following screening-detected, intermediate-risk adenomas: annual home-based stool test vs. triennial colonoscopy.
Bonello B; Ghanouni A; Bowyer HL; MacRae E; Atkin W; Halloran SP; Wardle J; von Wagner C
BMC Gastroenterol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):113. PubMed ID: 27618798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term performance of colorectal cancerscreening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test.
Zorzi M; Hassan C; Capodaglio G; Fedato C; Montaguti A; Turrin A; Rosano A; Monetti D; Stocco C; Baracco S; Russo F; Repici A; Rugge M
Gut; 2018 Dec; 67(12):2124-2130. PubMed ID: 29101260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One or two faecal immunochemical tests in an organised population-based colorectal cancer screening programme in Murcia (Spain).
Tourne-Garcia C; Perez-Riquelme F; Monteagudo-Piqueras O; Fraser CG; Yepes-Garcia P
J Med Screen; 2022 Dec; 29(4):231-240. PubMed ID: 35578555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the utility and acceptability of Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) as a novel intervention for the improvement of colorectal Cancer (CRC) surveillance in individuals with lynch syndrome (FIT for lynch study): a single-arm, prospective, multi-centre, non-randomised study.
Lincoln A; Benton S; Piggott C; North BV; Rigney J; Young C; Quirke P; Sasieni P; Monahan KJ
BMC Cancer; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1144. PubMed ID: 36344941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fecal immunochemical test in cancer screening - colonoscopy outcome in FIT positives and negatives.
Ribbing Wilén H; Blom J; Höijer J; Andersson G; Löwbeer C; Hultcrantz R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 54(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 30907196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Head-to-head comparison of the test performance of self-administered qualitative vs. laboratory-based quantitative fecal immunochemical tests in detecting colorectal neoplasm.
Lu M; Zhang YH; Lu B; Cai J; Liu CC; Chen HD; Dai M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2021 May; 134(11):1335-1344. PubMed ID: 34039863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia and relative colonoscopy workloads using quantitative faecal immunochemical tests: an observational study exploring the effects of simultaneous adjustment of both sample number and test positivity threshold.
Young GP; Woodman RJ; Symonds E
BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 32994195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Yield of One-Time Colonoscopy vs One-Time Flexible Sigmoidoscopy vs Multiple Rounds of Mailed Fecal Immunohistochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Grobbee EJ; van der Vlugt M; van Vuuren AJ; Stroobants AK; Mallant-Hent RC; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bossuyt PMM; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Mar; 18(3):667-675.e1. PubMed ID: 31419575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
