BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30618381)

  • 21. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
    Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
    Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk factors for early cytologic abnormalities after loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
    Dietrich CS; Yancey MK; Miyazawa K; Williams DL; Farley J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 11814494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prediction of recurrent disease by cytology and HPV testing after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Aerssens A; Claeys P; Beerens E; Garcia A; Weyers S; Van Renterghem L; Praet M; Temmerman M; Velasquez R; Cuvelier CA
    Cytopathology; 2009 Feb; 20(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 18510550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Residual lesions in uterine specimens after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with CIN.
    Jing L; Dan W; Zhunan L; Ying X; Yi C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):805-812. PubMed ID: 30167855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Low recurrence rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful excision and routine colposcopy during follow-up.
    Lili E; Chatzistamatiou K; Kalpaktsidou-Vakiani A; Moysiadis T; Agorastos T
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(4):e9719. PubMed ID: 29369205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the management of women with abnormal Pap smears. Experience of a colposcopy referral clinic.
    Ciotti M; Sesti F; Paba P; Benedetto A; Patrizi L; Criscuolo A; Piccione E; Branca M; Syrjänen K; Favalli C
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 15493169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictors of cervical dysplasia after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure in an inner-city population.
    Fogle RH; Spann CO; Easley KA; Basil JB
    J Reprod Med; 2004 Jun; 49(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 15283059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Linear array genotyping and hybrid capture II assay in detecting human papillomavirus genotypes in women referred for colposcopy due to abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Monsonego J; Pollini G; Evrard MJ; Sednaoui P; Monfort L; Quinzat D; Dachez R; Syrjänen K
    Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Jun; 19(6):385-92. PubMed ID: 18595876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors influencing persistence or recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
    Malapati R; Chaparala S; Cejtin HE
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Jul; 15(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 21716049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characteristics of a group of adolescents undergoing loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP).
    Perlman SE; Lubianca JN; Kahn JA
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 16(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12604140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.
    Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Mar; 42(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8636676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of Residual/Recurrent Disease and Its Risk Factors after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
    Wu J; Jia Y; Luo M; Duan Z
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016; 81(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 26337009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Value of endocervical curettage in follow-up for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia stage 2+ after loop electrosurgical excision.
    Cao D; Shen K; Chen Y; Xu Y; Wu D
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):584-589. PubMed ID: 32586604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High-risk cervical epithelial neoplasia grade 1 treated by loop electrosurgical excision: follow-up and value of HPV testing.
    Alonso I; Torné A; Puig-Tintoré LM; Esteve R; Quinto L; Garcia S; Campo E; Pahisa J; Ordi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 197(4):359.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17714678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of Cryotherapy vs Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure on Cervical Disease Recurrence Among Women With HIV and High-Grade Cervical Lesions in Kenya: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Greene SA; De Vuyst H; John-Stewart GC; Richardson BA; McGrath CJ; Marson KG; Trinh TT; Yatich N; Kiptinness C; Cagle A; Nyongesa-Malava E; Sakr SR; Mugo NR; Chung MH
    JAMA; 2019 Oct; 322(16):1570-1579. PubMed ID: 31638680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus testing and age at conisation.
    Verguts J; Bronselaer B; Donders G; Arbyn M; Van Eldere J; Drijkoningen M; Poppe W
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1303-7. PubMed ID: 16978225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A "See and Treat" approach for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical cytology.
    Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Khunamornpong S; Suprasert P; Phongnarisorn C; Siriaree S; Cheewakriangkrai C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Aug; 87(8):865-8. PubMed ID: 15471287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A retrospective observational study for the outcomes of women presenting to a colposcopy clinic with a high-grade Pap smear - Implications for a 'see and treat' approach to management.
    Blain G; Richards A; Pather S; Carter J; Saidi S
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Apr; 56(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 26864141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, after six months delay: a three-year experience in an Iranian university hospital.
    Yarandi F; Shojaei H; Eftekhar Z; Izadi-Mood N
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 49(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 19432613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.