These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30618973)

  • 1. Do People Explicitly Make a Frame Choice Based on the Reference Point?
    Honda H; Shirasuna M; Matsuka T; Ueda K
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2552. PubMed ID: 30618973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: reference points, frame selection, and framing effects.
    McKenzie CR; Nelson JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Sep; 10(3):596-602. PubMed ID: 14620352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames.
    Sher S; McKenzie CR
    Cognition; 2006 Oct; 101(3):467-94. PubMed ID: 16364278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Framing Preference for Large and Increasing Components in Static and Dynamic Descriptions.
    Pander Maat H; Staal B; Holleman B
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():720427. PubMed ID: 34867599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive Style and Frame Susceptibility in Decision-Making.
    Mandel DR; Kapler IV
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1461. PubMed ID: 30147670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the role of rarity information in speakers' choice of frame.
    Honda H; Matsuka T
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):768-79. PubMed ID: 24523047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Side Effects in Time Discounting Procedures: Fixed Alternatives Become the Reference Point.
    Sawicki P; Białek M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165245. PubMed ID: 27768759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Framing the Game: Examining Frame Choice in Bargaining.
    Blount S; Larrick RP
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Jan; 81(1):43-71. PubMed ID: 10631068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
    Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The physical environment matters: room effects on online purchase decisions.
    Eklund A; Edenbrandt A; Rahm J; Johansson M
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1354419. PubMed ID: 38957886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing the adaptability of people's use of attribute frame information.
    Harris AJL; Jenkins SC; Ma GWS; Oh A
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104720. PubMed ID: 33865045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Framing effects in inference tasks--and why they are normatively defensible.
    McKenzie CR
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Sep; 32(6):874-85. PubMed ID: 15673176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of negative emotion on the framing effect: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ma Q; Pei G; Wang K
    Neuroreport; 2015 Apr; 26(6):325-32. PubMed ID: 25714423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cued by What We See and Hear: Spatial Reference Frame Use in Language.
    Coventry KR; Andonova E; Tenbrink T; Gudde HB; Engelhardt PE
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1287. PubMed ID: 30150947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working memory loads differentially influence frame-induced bias and normative choice in risky decision making.
    Hinson JM; Whitney P; Wilson CG; Nusbaum AT
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214571. PubMed ID: 30921395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to aggregate health? Separability and the effect of framing.
    Turpcu A; Bleichrodt H; Le QA; Doctor JN
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 21875951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goal-directed visual attention drives health goal priming: An eye-tracking experiment.
    van der Laan LN; Papies EK; Hooge IT; Smeets PA
    Health Psychol; 2017 Jan; 36(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 27631308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Considering Roads Taken and Not Taken: How Psychological Distance Influences the Framing of Choice Events.
    Valenti G; Libby LK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1239-1254. PubMed ID: 28903677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Four-Year-Olds Use a Mixture of Spatial Reference Frames.
    Negen J; Nardini M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131984. PubMed ID: 26133990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.