215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30620221)
21. Similar outcomes between adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast and invasive ductal carcinoma: a population-based study from the SEER 18 database.
Chen QX; Li JJ; Wang XX; Lin PY; Zhang J; Song CG; Shao ZM
Oncotarget; 2017 Jan; 8(4):6206-6215. PubMed ID: 28008158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Stage Groups Updated in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging Manual.
Lee H; Lee M; Byun SS; Lee SE; Hong SK
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e221-e226. PubMed ID: 30472041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for systemic staging of newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer.
Ulaner GA; Castillo R; Goldman DA; Wills J; Riedl CC; Pinker-Domenig K; Jochelson MS; Gönen M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Oct; 43(11):1937-44. PubMed ID: 27129866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The comparison of the anatomic stage and pathological prognostic stage according to the AJCC 8th edition for the prognosis in Japanese breast cancer patients: data from a single institution.
Tokunaga E; Ijichi H; Tajiri W; Masuda T; Takizawa K; Ueo H; Koga C; Tanaka J; Nakamura Y; Ohno S; Taguchi K; Okamoto M
Breast Cancer; 2020 Nov; 27(6):1137-1146. PubMed ID: 32472474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision.
Jiang W; Zhao B; Li Y; Qi D; Wang D
BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1129. PubMed ID: 33225924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Triple-negative breast cancer outcomes: Does AJCC 8th staging improve chemotherapy decision-making.
Lian CL; Li GQ; Zhou P; Wang J; He ZY; Wu SG
Breast; 2021 Oct; 59():117-123. PubMed ID: 34229126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [A retrospective analysis on the prognostic evaluation of triple-negative breast cancer with prognostic staging according to the AJCC Breast Cancer Staging System, Eighth Edition].
Cheng YJ; Zhang S; Zhang H; Xu L; Ye JM; Li T; Duan XN; Liu YH
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 57(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 30929377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of the 8th edition of TNM staging system for gastric cancer: the results from the SEER and a single-institution database.
Zhao B; Zhang J; Zhang J; Luo R; Wang Z; Xu H; Huang B
Future Oncol; 2018 Dec; 14(29):3023-3035. PubMed ID: 30426787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of the 8th AJCC staging system for gastric cancer in a population-based setting.
Abdel-Rahman O
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 May; 12(5):525-530. PubMed ID: 29198151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer.
Lee SB; Sohn G; Kim J; Chung IY; Lee JW; Kim HJ; Ko BS; Son BH; Ahn SH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jun; 169(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 29388016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition on breast cancer staging and prognostication.
Savage P; Yu N; Dumitra S; Meterissian S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1817-1820. PubMed ID: 30926158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Prognostic Value of the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System in HER2-Enriched Subtype Breast Cancer, a Retrospective Analysis.
Zhou B; Xu L; Ye J; Xin L; Duan X; Liu Y
Anticancer Res; 2017 Aug; 37(8):4615-4621. PubMed ID: 28739761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The different outcomes between breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in triple-negative breast cancer: a population-based study from the SEER 18 database.
Chen QX; Wang XX; Lin PY; Zhang J; Li JJ; Song CG; Shao ZM
Oncotarget; 2017 Jan; 8(3):4773-4780. PubMed ID: 27999201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities or Trunk: A Cohort Study of the SEER Database.
Cates JMM
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Feb; 16(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 29439175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging system for luminal A breast cancer.
Ye J; Wang W; Xu L; Duan X; Cheng Y; Xin L; Zhang H; Zhang S; Li T; Liu Y
Chin J Cancer Res; 2017 Aug; 29(4):351-360. PubMed ID: 28947867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of the 8th AJCC prognostic staging system for breast cancer in a population-based setting.
Abdel-Rahman O
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Feb; 168(1):269-275. PubMed ID: 29143220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging in patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma: analysis of 2511 cases from a medical centre in Korea.
Kim KH; Yang SS; Yoon YS; Lim SB; Yu CS; Kim JC
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Aug; 13(8):e220-6. PubMed ID: 21689314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A population-based validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system.
Gimotty PA; Botbyl J; Soong SJ; Guerry D
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(31):8065-75. PubMed ID: 16258105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the 7th and 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems for breast cancer patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis.
Shao N; Xie C; Shi Y; Ye R; Long J; Shi H; Shan Z; Thompson AM; Lin Y
Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():1433-1442. PubMed ID: 30863154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging.
O'Connell JB; Maggard MA; Ko CY
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1420-5. PubMed ID: 15467030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
