693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30620770)
41. Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?
Teixeira AR; Bicalho D; Slater B; Lima TM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0235182. PubMed ID: 34370729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used for Neck Disorders: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.
Bobos P; MacDermid JC; Walton DM; Gross A; Santaguida PL
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2018 Oct; 48(10):775-788. PubMed ID: 29932874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Instruments assessing medication literacy in adult recipients of care: A systematic review of measurement properties.
Gentizon J; Hirt J; Jaques C; Lang PO; Mabire C
Int J Nurs Stud; 2021 Jan; 113():103785. PubMed ID: 33080478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of bronchiolitis assessment tools.
Davies CJ; Waters D; Marshall A
J Adv Nurs; 2017 Feb; 73(2):286-301. PubMed ID: 27509019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. German language questionnaires for assessing implementation constructs and outcomes of psychosocial and health-related interventions: a systematic review.
Kien C; Schultes MT; Szelag M; Schoberberger R; Gartlehner G
Implement Sci; 2018 Dec; 13(1):150. PubMed ID: 30541590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Instruments to assess self-care among healthy children: A systematic review of measurement properties.
Urpí-Fernández AM; Zabaleta-Del-Olmo E; Montes-Hidalgo J; Tomás-Sábado J; Roldán-Merino JF; Lluch-Canut MT
J Adv Nurs; 2017 Dec; 73(12):2832-2844. PubMed ID: 28617980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Instruments to assess self-efficacy among people with cardiovascular disease: A COSMIN systematic review.
Turan Kavradim S; Yangöz ŞT; Canli Ozer Z; Boz I
Int J Clin Pract; 2020 Nov; 74(11):e13606. PubMed ID: 33166049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of Supportive Care Needs Survey for Partners and Caregivers of Cancer Patients.
Liu JJ; Liu QH; He HY; Zhang T; Song YX; Wang W; Hong JF
J Cancer Educ; 2020 Feb; 35(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 30448909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Psychometric Properties of the Thai Version of Supportive Care Needs Survey-Partners and Caregivers (T- SCNS-P&C) for Cholangiocarcinoma Caregivers.
Sangruangake M; Summart U; Methakanjanasak N; Ruangsuksud P; Songthamwat M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Mar; 23(3):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 35345382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. School health assessment tools: a systematic review of measurement in primary schools.
Kazemitabar M; Moghadamzadeh A; Habibi M; Hakimzadeh R; Garcia D
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9459. PubMed ID: 32742780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Evaluating Cancer Symptoms: A Systematic Review.
Pérez-Alfonso KE; Sánchez-Martínez V
Semin Oncol Nurs; 2021 Apr; 37(2):151145. PubMed ID: 33773879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Content validity and reliability testing of the FIN-PED II: A tool to measure care needs of parents of children with cancer.
Monterosso L; Kristjanson LJ; Dadd G
J Nurs Meas; 2006; 14(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16764176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Assessing unmet supportive care needs in partners of cancer survivors: the development and evaluation of the Cancer Survivors' Partners Unmet Needs measure (CaSPUN).
Hodgkinson K; Butow P; Hobbs KM; Hunt GE; Lo SK; Wain G
Psychooncology; 2007 Sep; 16(9):805-13. PubMed ID: 17177180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Cross-Cultural Competence Inventory: Validity and psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation.
Barzykowski K; Majda A; Przyłęcki P; Szkup M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212730. PubMed ID: 30845146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Self-administered health literacy instruments for people with diabetes: systematic review of measurement properties.
Lee EH; Kim CJ; Lee J; Moon SH
J Adv Nurs; 2017 Sep; 73(9):2035-2048. PubMed ID: 28103387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Psychometric properties of cancer survivors' unmet needs survey.
Campbell HS; Sanson-Fisher R; Turner D; Hayward L; Wang XS; Taylor-Brown J
Support Care Cancer; 2010 Feb; 19(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 20099001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Psychometric properties of Hope Scales: A systematic review.
Redlich-Amirav D; Ansell LJ; Harrison M; Norrena KL; Armijo-Olivo S
Int J Clin Pract; 2018 Jul; 72(7):e13213. PubMed ID: 29920883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review.
Huang FF; Yang Q; Wang AN; Zhang JP
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Dec; 16(1):241. PubMed ID: 30591047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Tools for measuring client experiences and satisfaction with healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of measurement properties.
Banda S; Nkungula N; Chiumia IK; Rylance J; Limbani F
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Feb; 23(1):133. PubMed ID: 36759840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties.
Lee J; Lee EH; Chae D; Kim CJ
Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 May; 105():103498. PubMed ID: 32203756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
