These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30621659)
1. Impact of different restorative treatments for deep caries lesion in primary teeth (CEPECO 1) - study protocol for a noninferiority randomized clinical trial. da Silva GSQ; Raggio DP; Machado GFR; Mello-Moura ACV; Gimenez T; Floriano I; Tedesco TK BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30621659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulp vitality of primary molars with deep caries treated with ART restorations: 2-year RCT. Silva GSD; Raggio DP; Mello-Moura ACV; Gimenez T; Montagner AF; Floriano I; Lara JS; Calvo AFB; Pascareli-Carlos AM; Tedesco TK Braz Oral Res; 2022; 36():e061. PubMed ID: 36507748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Hesse D; de Araujo MP; Olegário IC; Innes N; Raggio DP; Bonifácio CC Trials; 2016 Mar; 17():169. PubMed ID: 27029801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. Bianchi RMD; Pascareli-Carlos AM; Floriano I; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Gimenez T; Holanda MC; da Silva GS; de Natal KH; Tedesco TK BMC Oral Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 33789643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial. Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Replacing amalgam with a high-viscosity glass-ionomer in restoring primary teeth: A cost-effectiveness study in Brasilia, Brazil. Goldman A; Frencken JE; De Amorim RG; Leal SC J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():80-86. PubMed ID: 29289729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition. Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Mickenautsch S; Yengopal V PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146512. PubMed ID: 26799812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Olegário IC; Hesse D; Bönecker M; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2016 Aug; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 27485432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT. Oliveira RC; Camargo LB; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Olegário IC; Gimenez T; Pássaro AL; Tedesco TK; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):371. PubMed ID: 34301217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Ladewig NM; Sahiara CS; Yoshioka L; Olegário IC; Floriano I; Tedesco TK; Mendes FM; Braga MM; Raggio DP BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(7):e015542. PubMed ID: 28698331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Atieh M Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT. Olegário IC; Pacheco AL; de Araújo MP; Ladewig NM; Bonifácio CC; Imparato JC; Raggio DP J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():45-50. PubMed ID: 27956016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preformed pediatric zirconia crown versus preformed pediatric metal crown: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Lopez-Cazaux S; Aiem E; Velly AM; Muller-Bolla M Trials; 2019 Aug; 20(1):530. PubMed ID: 31445509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Giomer composite compared to glass ionomer in occlusoproximal ART restorations of primary molars: 24-month RCT. Pássaro AL; Olegário IC; Laux CM; Oliveira RC; Tedesco TK; Raggio DP Aust Dent J; 2022 Jun; 67(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 34904247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival of multiple-surface ART restorations using a zinc-reinforced glass-ionomer restorative after 2 years: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial. Mobarak E; El-Deeb H; Daifalla LE; Ghaly M; Mustafa M; Sabry D; Fatah H; Mulder J; Creugers NHJ; Frencken JE Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):e185-e192. PubMed ID: 31235189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT. Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. Hübel S; Mejàre I Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]