These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Ethical Bargaining and Parental Exclusion: A Clinical Case Analysis. Guidry-Grimes L; Victor E J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 26399675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Content review of pediatric ethics consultations at a cancer center. Winter MC; Friedman DN; McCabe MS; Voigt LP Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2019 May; 66(5):e27617. PubMed ID: 30666797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol. Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Uninformed Origins: Should We Be Advising Parents on the Source of Medicines and Therapies? Ness TE; Tabb ZJ; Malek J; Placencia FX Health Care Anal; 2023 Dec; 31(3-4):186-195. PubMed ID: 37535146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ethics and law in the intensive care unit. Danbury CM; Waldmann CS Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2006 Dec; 20(4):589-603. PubMed ID: 17219943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End-of-Life Decisions. Wilkinson D; Truog R; Savulescu J Bioethics; 2016 Feb; 30(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 25908398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Decision-Making for an Incapacitated Pregnant Patient. Mabel H; Rose SL; Kodish E Hastings Cent Rep; 2017 Jul; 47(4):12-15. PubMed ID: 28749061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. "Nudge" in the clinical consultation--an acceptable form of medical paternalism? Aggarwal A; Davies J; Sullivan R BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 15():31. PubMed ID: 24742113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A decision for Sam. Gropelli T J Gerontol Nurs; 2005 Jan; 31(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15675784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Speaking about life and death in neonatology: How can communication with families be optimized?]. Pennaforte T; Moussa A; Janvier A Arch Pediatr; 2017 Feb; 24(2):146-154. PubMed ID: 27989403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Challenges of a simplified opt-out consent process in a neonatal randomised controlled trial: qualitative study of parents' and health professionals' views and experiences. McLeish J; Alderdice F; Robberts H; Cole C; Dorling J; Gale C; Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2021 May; 106(3):244-250. PubMed ID: 33139313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Follow-up in the field of reproductive medicine: an ethical exploration. Jans V; Dondorp W; Bonduelle M; de Die C; Mertes H; Pennings G; de Wert G Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Dec; 41(6):1144-1150. PubMed ID: 32967810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical Ethics Consultation in Neurology - a case series. Ilse B; Alt-Epping B; Günther A; Liman J; Simon A BMC Neurol; 2021 Jun; 21(1):216. PubMed ID: 34088284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Participation in multiple neonatal research studies. Ward Platt M Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2005 May; 90(3):F191. PubMed ID: 15846004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials. Modi N Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Companions or patients? The impact of family presence in genetic consultations for inherited breast cancer: Relational autonomy in practice. Gilbar R; Barnoy S Bioethics; 2018 Jul; 32(6):378-387. PubMed ID: 30133832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]