346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30623704)
1. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of perceived diagnostic image quality in direct digital panoramic images between standard and advanced external GOP image processing.
Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R; Persson B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Nov; 77(8):560-565. PubMed ID: 31146623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.
Svenson B; Larsson L; Båth M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26478956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detectability of normal anatomy in digital panoramic radiographs.
Gross H; Nilsson M; Hellén-Halme K
Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 25771652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic agreement of conventional and inverted scanned panoramic radiographs in the detection of the mandibular canal and the mental foramen.
Sakakura CE; Loffredo Lde C; Scaf G
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 15008448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.
Baksi BG; Alpöz E; Sogur E; Mert A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):424-30. PubMed ID: 20841460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.
Pittayapat P; Galiti D; Huang Y; Dreesen K; Schreurs M; Souza PC; Rubira-Bullen IR; Westphalen FH; Pauwels R; Kalema G; Willems G; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 22382448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Position of the mental foramen on panoramic radiographs and its relation to the horizontal course of the mandibular canal: a computed tomographic analysis.
Pyun JH; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Ahn SJ; Kim J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):890-5. PubMed ID: 22220715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The subjective image quality of conventional and digital panoramic radiography among 6 to 10 year old children.
Makris N; Tsiklakis K; Alexiou KE; Vierrou AM; Stefaniotis T
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 17315805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of proximal caries in vitro using standard and task-specific enhanced images from a storage phosphor plate system.
Li G; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE; Syriopoulos K; van der Stelt PF
Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 17426405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal.
Benediktsdottir IS; Hintze H; Petersen JK; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 12820852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.
Parissis N; Angelopoulos C; Mantegari S; Karamanis S; Masood F; Tsirlis A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jan; 11(1):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20098961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visualization of the superior and inferior borders of the mandibular canal: a comparative study using digital panoramic radiographs and cross-sectional computed tomography images.
Kamrun N; Tetsumura A; Nomura Y; Yamaguchi S; Baba O; Nakamura S; Watanabe H; Kurabayashi T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Apr; 115(4):550-7. PubMed ID: 23522648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients.
Kim TS; Obst C; Zehaczek S; Geenen C
J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18597595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
