166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30623752)
1. Predictive Validity of the Static-99 and Static-99R in Switzerland.
Gonçalves LC; Gerth J; Rossegger A; Noll T; Endrass J
Sex Abuse; 2020 Mar; 32(2):203-219. PubMed ID: 30623752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Field validity of Static-99/R scores in a statewide sample of 34,687 convicted sexual offenders.
Boccaccini MT; Rice AK; Helmus LM; Murrie DC; Harris PB
Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):611-623. PubMed ID: 28594205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Less Is More: Using Static-2002R Subscales to Predict Violent and General Recidivism Among Sexual Offenders.
Babchishin KM; Hanson RK; Blais J
Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):187-217. PubMed ID: 25667228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4,433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysis.
Helmus LM; Hanson RK; Murrie DC; Zabarauckas CL
Psychol Assess; 2021 Jul; 33(7):581-595. PubMed ID: 34014750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of the Static-99 and Static-99R With Latino Sex Offenders.
Leguízamo A; Lee SC; Jeglic EL; Calkins C
Sex Abuse; 2017 Dec; 29(8):765-785. PubMed ID: 26680251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).
Walters GD; Deming A; Casbon T
Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 25013121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Predictive Validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and Static-2002/R: Which One to Use?
Reeves SG; Ogloff JRP; Simmons M
Sex Abuse; 2018 Dec; 30(8):887-907. PubMed ID: 28597720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Updated 5-year and new 10-year sexual recidivism rate norms for Static-99R with routine/complete samples.
Lee SC; Hanson RK
Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 33734747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive Validity of Static-99R Among 8,207 Men Convicted of Sexual Crimes in South Korea: A Prospective Field Study.
Lee SC; Hanson RK; Yoon JS
Sex Abuse; 2023 Sep; 35(6):687-715. PubMed ID: 36394612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive and incremental validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and STABLE-2007 for sexual recidivism: A diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis (DTA-NMA).
Holper L; Cerullo E; Mokros A; Habermeyer E
Psychol Assess; 2024 Feb; 36(2):134-146. PubMed ID: 38059959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What Sexual Recidivism Rates Are Associated With Static-99R and Static-2002R Scores?
Hanson RK; Thornton D; Helmus LM; Babchishin KM
Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):218-52. PubMed ID: 25810478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does consideration of psychopathy and sexual deviance add to the predictive validity of the static-99R?
Looman J; Morphett NA; Abracen J
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Aug; 57(8):939-65. PubMed ID: 22641857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing the Static-99R as a Global Screen for Risk of Sex Crime Recidivism in a Norwegian Routine Sample.
Sandbukt IJ; Skardhamar T; Kristoffersen R; Friestad C
Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):725-742. PubMed ID: 32830607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.
Marshall E; Miller HA; Cortoni F; Helmus LM
Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):631-653. PubMed ID: 32659180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Preliminary Analysis of Sexual Recidivism and Predictive Validity of the Static-99R in Men Discharged From State Hospitals Pursuant to California's Sexually Violent Predator Act.
Azizian A; Olver ME; Rokop J; D'Orazio DM
Sex Abuse; 2022 Apr; 34(3):319-340. PubMed ID: 34154482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. STABLE-2007 Demonstrates Predictive and Incremental Validity in Assessing Risk-Relevant Propensities for Sexual Offending: A Meta-Analysis.
Brankley AE; Babchishin KM; Hanson RK
Sex Abuse; 2021 Feb; 33(1):34-62. PubMed ID: 31516097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.
Helmus L; Thornton D; Hanson RK; Babchishin KM
Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):64-101. PubMed ID: 21844404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offense version in sexual violence risk assessments: Updated risk categories and recidivism estimates from a multisite sample of treated sexual offenders.
Olver ME; Mundt JC; Thornton D; Beggs Christofferson SM; Kingston DA; Sowden JN; Nicholaichuk TP; Gordon A; Wong SCP
Psychol Assess; 2018 Jul; 30(7):941-955. PubMed ID: 29708372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 2015 Static-99R: Alternative Recidivism Tables for High-Risk Offenders.
Elwood RW; Kelley SM; Mundt JC
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2017 Oct; 61(14):1593-1605. PubMed ID: 26758206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive accuracy of Static-99R across different racial/ethnic groups: A meta-analysis.
Ahmed S; Lee SC; Helmus LM
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):275-291. PubMed ID: 36931863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
