233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30623902)
1. Defect-oriented reconstruction after transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a case series and review of the literature.
Meccariello G; Montevecchi F; Sgarzani R; Vicini C
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2018 Dec; 38(6):569-574. PubMed ID: 30623902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The reconstructive options for oropharyngeal defects in the transoral robotic surgery framework.
Meccariello G; Montevecchi F; Sgarzani R; De Vito A; D'Agostino G; Gobbi R; Bellini C; Vicini C
Oral Oncol; 2017 Mar; 66():108-111. PubMed ID: 28089208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics and outcomes of transoral robotic surgery with free-flap reconstruction for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review.
Monroe D; Pyne JM; McLennan S; Kimmis R; Yoon J; Biron VL
J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1287-1297. PubMed ID: 36964850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Research progress of transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal cancer].
Huang GJ; Luo MS; Zhang JX; Zhu CM; Liu YH; Zhang HB
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 31(2):159-161. PubMed ID: 29871213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transoral robotic surgery with radial forearm free flap reconstruction: case control analysis.
Biron VL; O'Connell DA; Barber B; Clark JM; Andrews C; Jeffery CC; Côté DW; Harris J; Seikaly H
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Mar; 46(1):20. PubMed ID: 28292318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nasoseptal flap for reconstruction after robotic radical tonsillectomy.
Pinheiro-Neto CD; Galati LT
Head Neck; 2016 Sep; 38(9):E2495-8. PubMed ID: 27142938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative safety and effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery versus open surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park DA; Lee MJ; Kim SH; Lee SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):644-649. PubMed ID: 31627931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oropharyngeal reconstruction after transoral robotic surgery.
Silverman DA; Birkeland AC; Bewley AF
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Oct; 30(5):384-391. PubMed ID: 36004787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstructive algorithm and classification system for transoral oropharyngeal defects.
de Almeida JR; Park RC; Villanueva NL; Miles BA; Teng MS; Genden EM
Head Neck; 2014 Jul; 36(7):934-41. PubMed ID: 23606444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defining the Role of Free Flaps for Transoral Robotic Surgery.
Hatten KM; Brody RM; Weinstein GS; Newman JG; Bur AM; Chalian AA; OʼMalley BW; Rassekh CH; Cannady SB
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 80(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 29095187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional outcomes, feasibility, and safety of resection of transoral robotic surgery: single-institution series of 35 consecutive cases of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Lörincz BB; Möckelmann N; Busch CJ; Knecht R
Head Neck; 2015 Nov; 37(11):1618-24. PubMed ID: 24955923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The temporalis muscle flap for reconstruction of soft palate and lateral oropharyngeal wall after transoral robotic surgery.
Meccariello G; Montevecchi F; Deganello A; D'Agostino G; Bellini C; Zeccardo E; Vicini C
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):162-164. PubMed ID: 28007349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transoral robotic salvage oropharyngectomy with submental artery island flap reconstruction.
Holcomb AJ; Richmon JD
Head Neck; 2021 Feb; 43(2):E13-E19. PubMed ID: 33210351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects after transoral robotic surgery. Review and recommendations of the Commission of Head and Neck Surgery of the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery.
González García JÁ; Pollán Guisasola C; Chiesa Estomba CM; Viña Soria C; Virós Porcuna D
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019; 70(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 29857957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transoral robotic retropharyngeal lymph node dissection with or without lateral oropharyngectomy.
Byeon HK; Duvvuri U; Kim WS; Park YM; Hong HJ; Koh YW; Choi EC
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1156-61. PubMed ID: 23851761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of Free Flap Reconstruction Following Salvage Robotic-Assisted Resection of Recurrent and Residual Oropharyngeal Cancer in 3 Patients.
Williamson A; Haywood M; Awad Z
Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Dec; 100(10_suppl):1113S-1118S. PubMed ID: 32608257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transoral robotic surgery for residual and recurrent oropharyngeal cancers: Exploratory study of surgical innovation using the IDEAL framework for early-phase surgical studies.
Paleri V; Fox H; Coward S; Ragbir M; McQueen A; Ahmed O; Meikle D; Saleh D; O'Hara J; Robinson M
Head Neck; 2018 Mar; 40(3):512-525. PubMed ID: 29244229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First use of a new retractor in transoral robotic surgery (TORS).
Hasskamp P; Lang S; Holtmann L; Stuck BA; Mattheis S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jul; 273(7):1913-7. PubMed ID: 26179869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transoral robotic surgery and oropharyngeal cancer: a literature review.
O'Leary P; Kjærgaard T
Ear Nose Throat J; 2014 Aug; 93(8):E14-21. PubMed ID: 25181669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oncological outcome following de-intensification of treatment for stage I and II HPV negative oropharyngeal cancers with transoral robotic surgery (TORS): A prospective trial.
Dabas S; Gupta K; Ranjan R; Sharma AK; Shukla H; Dinesh A
Oral Oncol; 2017 Jun; 69():80-83. PubMed ID: 28559025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
