BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30624251)

  • 1. Hearing Impairment and Perceived Clarity of Predictable Speech.
    Signoret C; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1140-1148. PubMed ID: 30624251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined effects of form- and meaning-based predictability on perceived clarity of speech.
    Signoret C; Johnsrude I; Classon E; Rudner M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):277-285. PubMed ID: 28557490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic Predictability Facilitates Comprehension of Degraded Speech in a Graded Manner.
    Bhandari P; Demberg V; Kray J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714485. PubMed ID: 34566795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical Effects on the Perceived Clarity of Noise-Vocoded Speech in Younger and Older Listeners.
    Tamati TN; Sevich VA; Clausing EM; Moberly AC
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():837644. PubMed ID: 35432072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential effects of hearing impairment and age on electrophysiological and behavioral measures of speech in noise.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():130-142. PubMed ID: 30388571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing Mechanisms in Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Evidence from Reaction Times and Sentence Interpretation.
    Carroll R; Uslar V; Brand T; Ruigendijk E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e391-e401. PubMed ID: 27748664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intelligibility and Clarity of Reverberant Speech: Effects of Wide Dynamic Range Compression Release Time and Working Memory.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 59(6):1543-1554. PubMed ID: 27997667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.
    Best V; Keidser G; Freeston K; Buchholz JM
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 28826285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing Instruments for Unilateral Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kitterick PT; Smith SN; Lucas L
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):495-507. PubMed ID: 27232073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.