These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30624251)

  • 21. The Influence of Form- and Meaning-Based Predictions on Cortical Speech Processing Under Challenging Listening Conditions: A MEG Study.
    Signoret C; Andersen LM; Dahlström Ö; Blomberg R; Lundqvist D; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():573254. PubMed ID: 33100961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Working Memory and Speech Comprehension in Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.
    Nagaraj NK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 60(10):2949-2964. PubMed ID: 29049596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual Doping: An Audiovisual Facilitation Effect on Auditory Speech Processing, From Phonetic Feature Extraction to Sentence Identification in Noise.
    Moradi S; Lidestam B; Ning Ng EH; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):312-327. PubMed ID: 29870521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Better-ear glimpsing at low frequencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1192. PubMed ID: 27586748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.
    Koeritzer MA; Rogers CS; Van Engen KJ; Peelle JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):740-751. PubMed ID: 29450493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
    Kortlang S; Chen Z; Gerkmann T; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 25166628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
    Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech.
    Guediche S; Reilly M; Santiago C; Laurent P; Blumstein SE
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():57-74. PubMed ID: 27100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.
    Jin SH; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3097-108. PubMed ID: 16708964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition.
    Alexander JM; Masterson K
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e35-49. PubMed ID: 25470368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Narrowed expectancies under degraded speech: revisiting the N400.
    Strauß A; Kotz SA; Obleser J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Aug; 25(8):1383-95. PubMed ID: 23489145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults.
    Pittman AL; Stelmachowicz PG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Dec; 43(6):1389-401. PubMed ID: 11193960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.