166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30624291)
1. Monitoring haemodynamic response to fluid-challenge in ICU: comparison of pressure recording analytical method and oesophageal Doppler: A prospective observational study.
Barthélémy R; Neuschwander A; Dramé F; Redouté M; Ditchi D; Stern J; Mebazaa A; Pirracchio R; Chousterman BG
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Feb; 36(2):135-143. PubMed ID: 30624291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient.
Mercado P; Maizel J; Beyls C; Titeca-Beauport D; Joris M; Kontar L; Riviere A; Bonef O; Soupison T; Tribouilloy C; de Cagny B; Slama M
Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 28595621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pressure recording analytical method for measuring cardiac output in critically ill children: a validation study.
Saxena R; Durward A; Puppala NK; Murdoch IA; Tibby SM
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Mar; 110(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 23183320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A preliminary study evaluating cardiac output measurement using Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) in anaesthetized dogs.
Briganti A; Evangelista F; Centonze P; Rizzo A; Bentivegna F; Crovace A; Staffieri F
BMC Vet Res; 2018 Mar; 14(1):72. PubMed ID: 29510691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Value of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output monitoring of cardiac function in septic shock patients: a prospective study].
Yi M; Yao G; Guo X
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25591432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oesophageal Doppler and calibrated pulse contour analysis are not interchangeable within a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm in major gynaecological surgery.
Feldheiser A; Hunsicker O; Krebbel H; Weimann K; Kaufner L; Wernecke KD; Spies C
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Nov; 113(5):822-31. PubMed ID: 25107544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ability of esCCO to track changes in cardiac output.
Biais M; Berthezène R; Petit L; Cottenceau V; Sztark F
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 26209443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thermodilution vs pressure recording analytical method in hemodynamic stabilized patients.
Donati A; Carsetti A; Tondi S; Scorcella C; Domizi R; Damiani E; Gabbanelli V; Münch C; Adrario E; Pelaia P; Cecconi M
J Crit Care; 2014 Apr; 29(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 24332994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A minimally invasive monitoring system of cardiac output using aortic flow velocity and peripheral arterial pressure profile.
Uemura K; Kawada T; Inagaki M; Sugimachi M
Anesth Analg; 2013 May; 116(5):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 23492964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of radial artery-based uncalibrated pulse contour method (PulsioFlex) in critically ill patients: A observational study.
Grensemann J; Defosse JM; Willms M; Schiller U; Wappler F; Sakka SG
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Nov; 34(11):723-731. PubMed ID: 28984797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oesophageal Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of haemodynamic status of patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit with septic shock.
Chew HC; Devanand A; Phua GC; Loo CM
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2009 Aug; 38(8):699-703. PubMed ID: 19736574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of noninvasive bioreactance with oesophageal Doppler estimation of stroke volume during open abdominal surgery: an observational study.
Conway DH; Hussain OA; Gall I
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Aug; 30(8):501-8. PubMed ID: 23549128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stroke volume optimization in elective bowel surgery: a comparison between pulse power wave analysis (LiDCOrapid) and oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ).
Nordström J; Hällsjö-Sander C; Shore R; Björne H
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Mar; 110(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 23171725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calibrated versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis in monitoring cardiac output with transpulmonary thermodilution in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational study.
Slagt C; Helmi M; Malagon I; Groeneveld AB
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 25387298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Systolic Cardiac Function on Passive Leg Raising for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness: A Prospective Observational Study.
Si X; Cao DY; Chen J; Wu JF; Liu ZM; Xu HL; Chen MY; Liu YJ; Guan XD
Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Feb; 131(3):253-261. PubMed ID: 29363638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of cardiac output measured by oesophageal Doppler ultrasonography or pulse pressure contour wave analysis.
Caillard A; Gayat E; Tantot A; Dubreuil G; M'Bakulu E; Madadaki C; Bart F; Bresson D; Froelich S; Mebazaa A; Vallée F
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jun; 114(6):893-900. PubMed ID: 25735709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
Terada T; Oiwa A; Maemura Y; Robert S; Kessoku S; Ochiai R
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 26370094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of continous-wave Doppler ultrasound monitor and echocardiography to assess cardiac output in intensive care patients.
Elgendy A; Seppelt IM; Lane AS
Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Sep; 19(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 28866972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of impedance cardiography for evaluating trends in cardiac output: a comparison with oesophageal Doppler.
Lorne E; Mahjoub Y; Diouf M; Sleghem J; Buchalet C; Guinot PG; Petiot S; Kessavane A; Dehedin B; Dupont H
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 24871872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparision of cardiac output measured by transthoracic echocardiography with continuous cardiac output measured by pressure recording analytical method.
Madhuri MR; Singh NG; Nagaraja PS; Pranathi E; Prabhu Shankar CG; Satish N; Prabhakar V; Gupta A
Ann Card Anaesth; 2023; 26(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 37706379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
