These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30624291)

  • 21. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
    Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography.
    Calamandrei M; Mirabile L; Muschetta S; Gensini GF; De Simone L; Romano SM
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2008 May; 9(3):310-2. PubMed ID: 18446106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method.
    Biais M; Cottenceau V; Stecken L; Jean M; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Sztark F
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1186-91. PubMed ID: 22425817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy, Precision, and Trending Ability of Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis of Cardiac Output in Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function: A Prospective, Observational Study.
    Montenij LJ; Sonneveld JP; Nierich AP; Buhre WF; De Waal EE
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jan; 30(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 26520028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of cardiac output variations with the peripheral pulse pressure to mean arterial pressure ratio.
    Tantot A; Caillard A; Le Gall A; Mateo J; Millasseau S; Mebazaa A; Gayat E; Vallée F
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2019 Aug; 33(4):581-587. PubMed ID: 30361823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring: agreement of oesophageal Doppler, LiDCOrapid™ and Vigileo FloTrac™ monitors in non-cardiac surgery.
    Phan TD; Kluger R; Wan C
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2016 May; 44(3):382-90. PubMed ID: 27246939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of esCCO and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output intensive care.
    Bataille B; Bertuit M; Mora M; Mazerolles M; Cocquet P; Masson B; Moussot PE; Ginot J; Silva S; Larché J
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Dec; 109(6):879-86. PubMed ID: 22907340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of a multiparametric score based on pulse wave analysis for prediction of fluid responsiveness: ancillary analysis of an observational study.
    Neuschwander A; Barthélémy R; Ditchi D; Dramé F; Redouté M; Stern J; Cholley B; Mebazaa A; Chousterman BG; Pirracchio R
    Can J Anaesth; 2020 Sep; 67(9):1162-1169. PubMed ID: 32500514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in critically ill unstable patients after cardiac surgery.
    Barile L; Landoni G; Pieri M; Ruggeri L; Maj G; Nigro Neto C; Pasin L; Cabrini L; Zangrillo A
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1108-13. PubMed ID: 23992652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The value of arterial pressure waveform cardiac output measurements in the radial and femoral artery in major cardiac surgery patients.
    van Drumpt A; van Bommel J; Hoeks S; Grüne F; Wolvetang T; Bekkers J; Ter Horst M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28288587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Residents and ICU nurses get reliable static and dynamic haemodynamic assessments with aortic oesophageal Doppler.
    Robert JM; Floccard B; Crozon J; Boyle EM; Levrat A; Guillaume C; Benatir F; Faure A; Marcotte G; Hautin E; Allaouchiche B
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Apr; 56(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 22191401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.
    Yonis H; Bitker L; Aublanc M; Perinel Ragey S; Riad Z; Lissonde F; Louf-Durier A; Debord S; Gobert F; Tapponnier R; Guérin C; Richard JC
    Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 29208025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of cardiac output variations induced by hemodynamic interventions using multi-beat analysis of arterial waveform: a comparative off-line study with transesophageal Doppler method during non-cardiac surgery.
    Le Gall A; Vallée F; Joachim J; Hong A; Matéo J; Mebazaa A; Gayat E
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Apr; 36(2):501-510. PubMed ID: 33687601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shock in the first 24 h of intensive care unit stay: observational study of protocol-based fluid management.
    See KC; Mukhopadhyay A; Lau SC; Tan SM; Lim TK; Phua J
    Shock; 2015 May; 43(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 25608139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of oesophageal Doppler monitoring in critically ill and high-risk surgical patients.
    Mowatt G; Houston G; Hernández R; de Verteuil R; Fraser C; Cuthbertson B; Vale L
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jan; 13(7):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-95. PubMed ID: 19200414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating the rapid haemodynamic effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients using bioreactance.
    Galarza L; Mercado P; Teboul JL; Girotto V; Beurton A; Richard C; Monnet X
    Br J Anaesth; 2018 Sep; 121(3):567-573. PubMed ID: 30115254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of stroke volume measurement between non-invasive bioreactance and esophageal Doppler in patients undergoing major abdominal-pelvic surgery.
    De Pascale G; Singer M; Brealey D
    J Anesth; 2017 Aug; 31(4):545-551. PubMed ID: 28391426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of fluid administration on arterial load in septic shock patients.
    Monge García MI; Guijo González P; Gracia Romero M; Gil Cano A; Oscier C; Rhodes A; Grounds RM; Cecconi M
    Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1247-55. PubMed ID: 26077088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Renal perfusion assessment by renal Doppler during fluid challenge in sepsis.
    Schnell D; Camous L; Guyomarc'h S; Duranteau J; Canet E; Gery P; Dumenil AS; Zeni F; Azoulay E; Darmon M
    Crit Care Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 23591208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Arterial pressure waveform analysis versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement during open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective observational study.
    Montenij LJ; Buhre WF; de Jong SA; Harms JH; van Herwaarden JA; Kruitwagen CL; de Waal EE
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 25303970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.