These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30624399)

  • 1. Intraoperative Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Electrodes Using Mobile Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Yamamoto N; Okano T; Yamazaki H; Hiraumi H; Sakamoto T; Ito J; Omori K
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 30624399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
    Boyer E; Karkas A; Attye A; Lefournier V; Escude B; Schmerber S
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of electrode position between round window and cochleostomy inserting approaches among young children: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Fan X; Xia M; Wang Z; Zhang H; Liu C; Wang N; Hou L; Li C; Xu A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):815-821. PubMed ID: 29936898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrode Location and Angular Insertion Depth Are Predictors of Audiologic Outcomes in Cochlear Implantation.
    O'Connell BP; Cakir A; Hunter JB; Francis DO; Noble JH; Labadie RF; Zuniga G; Dawant BM; Rivas A; Wanna GB
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Sep; 37(8):1016-23. PubMed ID: 27348391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of insertion quality of a slim perimodiolar electrode array.
    Beck R; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Rauch AK; Ketterer MC
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1215-1220. PubMed ID: 37773530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results.
    Wanna GB; Noble JH; Gifford RH; Dietrich MS; Sweeney AD; Zhang D; Dawant BM; Rivas A; Labadie RF
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(8):1343-8. PubMed ID: 26176556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
    Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.
    Wanna GB; Noble JH; Carlson ML; Gifford RH; Dietrich MS; Haynes DS; Dawant BM; Labadie RF
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124 Suppl 6(0 6):S1-7. PubMed ID: 24764083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging of the human cochlea using micro-computed tomography before and after cochlear implantation: comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Karkas A; Boureille P; Laroche N; Vico L; Bergandi F; Marotte H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3131-3140. PubMed ID: 36604323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?
    Poley M; Overmyer E; Craun P; Holcomb M; Reilly B; White D; Preciado D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1404-7. PubMed ID: 26166451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survey of the American Neurotology Society on Cochlear Implantation: Part 2, Surgical and Device-Related Practice Patterns.
    Carlson ML; O'Connell BP; Lohse CM; Driscoll CL; Sweeney AD
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):e20-e27. PubMed ID: 29210943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
    Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a new mid-scala cochlear implant electrode using microcomputed tomography.
    Frisch CD; Carlson ML; Lane JI; Driscoll CL
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Dec; 125(12):2778-83. PubMed ID: 25946683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation - a human cadaveric study.
    Nateghifard K; Low D; Awofala L; Srikanthan D; Kuthubutheen J; Daly M; Chan H; Irish J; Chen J; Lin V; Le TN
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):65. PubMed ID: 31753027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the Position of the Basal-Most Electrode Depending on Electrode Array Design and Influencing Postoperative Speech Perception? A Retrospective Analysis of 495 Ears.
    Beck RL; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Ketterer MC
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jun; 45(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 38509805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging cochlear implantation with round window insertion in human temporal bones and cochlear morphological variation using high-resolution cone beam CT.
    Zou J; Lähelmä J; Koivisto J; Dhanasingh A; Jolly C; Aarnisalo A; Wolff J; Pyykkö I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 May; 135(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 25675836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Intracochlear electrode position: evaluation after deep insertion using cone beam computed tomography].
    Güldner C; Weiss R; Eivazi B; Bien S; Werner JA; Diogo I
    HNO; 2012 Sep; 60(9):817-22. PubMed ID: 22767189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode.
    Aschendorff A; Briggs R; Brademann G; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):169-179. PubMed ID: 29059669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of the electrode position by CBCT following cochlear implantation].
    Fan XT; Wang N; Hou LX; Wang Z; Zhang H; Xu AT
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):566-570. PubMed ID: 31434368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.