BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30624994)

  • 1. Comparison of Automated Office Blood Pressure With Office and Out-Off-Office Measurement Techniques.
    Pappaccogli M; Di Monaco S; Perlo E; Burrello J; D'Ascenzo F; Veglio F; Monticone S; Rabbia F
    Hypertension; 2019 Feb; 73(2):481-490. PubMed ID: 30624994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings With Other Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement for Identifying Patients With Possible Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Roerecke M; Kaczorowski J; Myers MG
    JAMA Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 179(3):351-362. PubMed ID: 30715088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care.
    Myers MG; Kaczorowski J; Dawes M; Godwin M
    Can Fam Physician; 2014 Feb; 60(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 24522674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attended and Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements Have Better Agreement With Ambulatory Monitoring Than Conventional Office Readings.
    Andreadis EA; Geladari CV; Angelopoulos ET; Savva FS; Georgantoni AI; Papademetriou V
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Apr; 7(8):. PubMed ID: 29627767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attended Versus Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Andreadis EA; Thomopoulos C; Geladari CV; Papademetriou V
    High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 31290085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Office blood pressure measurement in the 21st century.
    Myers MG; Asmar R; Staessen JA
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2018 Jul; 20(7):1104-1107. PubMed ID: 30003698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of the Optimal Protocol for Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement Among Patients With Treated Hypertension.
    Moore MN; Schultz MG; Nelson MR; Black JA; Dwyer NB; Hoban E; Jose MD; Kosmala W; Przewlocka-Kosmala M; Zachwyc J; Otahal P; Picone DS; Roberts-Thomson P; Veloudi P; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2018 Feb; 31(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 29126128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated Office Blood Pressure and the Impact of Attendance and Rest on Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Green BB; Anderson ML; Cook AJ; Ehrlich K; Hall YN; Margolis KL; Thompson MJ
    Am J Hypertens; 2022 Jul; 35(7):638-646. PubMed ID: 35240678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings More Variable Than Home Readings?
    Myers MG; Kaczorowski J
    Hypertension; 2020 May; 75(5):1179-1183. PubMed ID: 32200678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison Between Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements and Manual Office Blood Pressure Measurements-Implications in Individual Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Bo Y; Kwok KO; Chu KK; Leung EY; Yu CP; Wong SY; Lee EK
    Curr Hypertens Rep; 2021 Jan; 23(1):4. PubMed ID: 33452580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparability of Automated Office Blood Pressure to Daytime 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure.
    Ringrose JS; Cena J; Ip S; Morales F; Hamilton P; Padwal R
    Can J Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 34(1):61-65. PubMed ID: 29198463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Replacing manual sphygmomanometers with automated blood pressure measurement in routine clinical practice.
    Myers MG
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2014 Jan; 41(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 23819734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial.
    Myers MG; Godwin M; Dawes M; Kiss A; Tobe SW; Kaczorowski J
    Fam Pract; 2012 Aug; 29(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 22117083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Threshold for diagnosing hypertension by automated office blood pressure using random sample population data.
    Wohlfahrt P; Cífková R; Movsisyan N; Kunzová Š; Lešovský J; Homolka M; Soška V; Bauerová H; Lopez-Jimenez F; Sochor O
    J Hypertens; 2016 Nov; 34(11):2180-6. PubMed ID: 27512968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why use automated office blood pressure measurements in clinical practice?
    Andreadis EA; Angelopoulos ET; Agaliotis GD; Tsakanikas AP; Mousoulis GP
    High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev; 2011 Sep; 18(3):89-91. PubMed ID: 21950780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between unattended automated office blood pressure and conventional office blood pressure under the environment of health checkup among Japanese general population.
    Sakuma H; Nakagawa N; Horiuchi K; Hayasaka T; Maruyama K; Sawada J; Minoshima A; Fujino T; Takeuchi T; Sato N; Osanai S; Hasebe N
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2020 Oct; 22(10):1800-1806. PubMed ID: 33245630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large discrepancy between unobserved automated office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure in a high cardiovascular risk cohort.
    Seo J; Lee CJ; Oh J; Lee SH; Kang SM; Park S
    J Hypertens; 2019 Jan; 37(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 30507862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated office versus home measurement of blood pressure in the assessment of morning hypertension.
    Andreadis EA; Angelopoulos ET; Tsakanikas AP; Agaliotis GD; Kravvariti SD; Mousoulis GP
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Feb; 17(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 22218221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of awake ambulatory blood pressure and automated office blood pressure using linear regression analysis in untreated patients in routine clinical practice.
    Myers MG; Matangi M; Kaczorowski J
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2018 Dec; 20(12):1696-1702. PubMed ID: 30328275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does This Adult Patient Have Hypertension?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.
    Viera AJ; Yano Y; Lin FC; Simel DL; Yun J; Dave G; Von Holle A; Viera LA; Shimbo D; Hardy ST; Donahue KE; Hinderliter A; Voisin CE; Jonas DE
    JAMA; 2021 Jul; 326(4):339-347. PubMed ID: 34313682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.