BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30625648)

  • 1. Patterns of sediment-associated fecal indicator bacteria in an urban estuary: Benthic-pelagic coupling and implications for shoreline water quality.
    O'Mullan GD; Juhl AR; Reichert R; Schneider E; Martinez N
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 656():1168-1177. PubMed ID: 30625648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sediment composition influences spatial variation in the abundance of human pathogen indicator bacteria within an estuarine environment.
    Perkins TL; Clements K; Baas JH; Jago CF; Jones DL; Malham SK; McDonald JE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112951. PubMed ID: 25397595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persistence of fecal indicator bacteria in Santa Monica Bay beach sediments.
    Lee CM; Lin TY; Lin CC; Kohbodi GA; Bhatt A; Lee R; Jay JA
    Water Res; 2006 Aug; 40(14):2593-602. PubMed ID: 16793111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland.
    Sanders BF; Arega F; Sutula M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.
    Rothenheber D; Jones S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 30006393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of wild animal sources of fecal indicator bacteria by microbial source tracking (MST) influences regulatory decisions.
    Nguyen KH; Senay C; Young S; Nayak B; Lobos A; Conrad J; Harwood VJ
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():424-434. PubMed ID: 30059905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pathogen and Surrogate Survival in Relation to Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Freshwater Mesocosms.
    Baker CA; Almeida G; Lee JA; Gibson KE
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2021 Jul; 87(15):e0055821. PubMed ID: 34047635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loading of fecal indicator bacteria in North Carolina tidal creek headwaters: hydrographic patterns and terrestrial runoff relationships.
    Stumpf CH; Piehler MF; Thompson S; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4704-15. PubMed ID: 20673947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying environmental reservoirs of fecal indicator bacteria associated with sediment and submerged aquatic vegetation.
    Badgley BD; Thomas FI; Harwood VJ
    Environ Microbiol; 2011 Apr; 13(4):932-42. PubMed ID: 21208357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence and abundance of traditional and host-associated fecal indicators in urban estuarine sediments: Potential implications for estuarine water quality monitoring.
    Ahmed W; Payyappat S; Cassidy M; Harrison N; Marinoni O; Besley C
    Water Res; 2020 Oct; 184():116109. PubMed ID: 32818744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sediment-water exchange of Vibrio sp. and fecal indicator bacteria: implications for persistence and transport in the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA.
    Fries JS; Characklis GW; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):941-50. PubMed ID: 17945328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the occurrence and survival of fecal indicator bacteria in recreational sand between urban beach, playground and sandbox settings in Toronto, Ontario.
    Staley ZR; Robinson C; Edge TA
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 541():520-527. PubMed ID: 26432162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sources and growth dynamics of fecal indicator bacteria in a coastal wetland system and potential impacts to adjacent waters.
    Evanson M; Ambrose RF
    Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 16386284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Risk of
    Wyness AJ; Paterson DM; Rimmer JEV; Defew EC; Stutter MI; Avery LM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(18):. PubMed ID: 31491848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction of bacterial communities and indicators of water quality in shoreline sand, sediment, and water of Lake Michigan.
    Nevers MB; Byappanahalli MN; Nakatsu CH; Kinzelman JL; Phanikumar MS; Shively DA; Spoljaric AM
    Water Res; 2020 Jul; 178():115671. PubMed ID: 32380294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the presence of human-associated and fecal indicator real-time quantitative PCR genetic markers in urban-impacted recreational beaches.
    Molina M; Hunter S; Cyterski M; Peed LA; Kelty CA; Sivaganesan M; Mooney T; Prieto L; Shanks OC
    Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():196-208. PubMed ID: 25061692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fecal indicator bacteria, direct pathogen detection, and microbial community analysis provide different microbiological water quality assessment of a tropical urban marine estuary.
    Saingam P; Li B; Yan T
    Water Res; 2020 Oct; 185():116280. PubMed ID: 32814164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fecal indicator bacteria levels at beaches in the Florida Keys after Hurricane Irma.
    Roca MA; Brown RS; Solo-Gabriele HM
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Jan; 138():266-273. PubMed ID: 30660273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal variations in fecal indicator bacteria in bathing water and sediment in a coastal ecosystem (Aytré Bay, Charente-Maritime, France).
    Ndione M; Ory P; Agion T; Treilles M; Vacher L; Simon-Bouhet B; Le Beguec M; Pineau P; Montanié H; Agogué H
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Feb; 175():113360. PubMed ID: 35134737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stratification and loading of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in a tidally muted urban salt marsh.
    Johnston KK; Dorsey JH; Saez JA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Mar; 187(3):58. PubMed ID: 25647802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.