These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30626149)

  • 1. Investigation of the Contributory Factors to the Guessability of Traffic Signs.
    Liu J; Wen H; Zhu D; Kumfer W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 30626149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The guessability of traffic signs: effects of prospective-user factors and sign design features.
    Ng AW; Chan AH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Nov; 39(6):1245-57. PubMed ID: 17920849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The guessing of mine safety signs meaning: effects of user factors and cognitive sign features.
    Chan AH; Ng AW
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2012; 18(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 22721538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Driver's Cognitive Workload and Driving Performance under Traffic Sign Information Exposure in Complex Environments: A Case Study of the Highways in China.
    Lyu N; Xie L; Wu C; Fu Q; Deng C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 28218696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of driver factors and sign design features on the comprehensibility of traffic signs.
    Ng AW; Chan AH
    J Safety Res; 2008; 39(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 18571574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of prospective-user factors and sign design features on guessability of pharmaceutical pictograms.
    Chan AH; Chan KW
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Feb; 90(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 23146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An approach for evaluating the effectiveness of traffic guide signs at intersections.
    Yao X; Zhao X; Liu H; Huang L; Ma J; Yin J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():7-20. PubMed ID: 31100686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating the role of socio-economic factors in comprehension of traffic signs using decision tree algorithm.
    Taamneh M
    J Safety Res; 2018 Sep; 66():121-129. PubMed ID: 30121098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of traffic sign design and personal characteristics on the usability of traffic signs.
    Taheri F; Torshizi YF; Saremi M; Pronin M
    Work; 2022; 71(4):917-925. PubMed ID: 35275591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Traffic sign symbol comprehension: a cross-cultural study.
    Shinar D; Dewar R; Summala H; Zakowska L
    Ergonomics; 2003 Dec; 46(15):1549-65. PubMed ID: 14668174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relation between driving experience and recognition of road signs relative to their locations.
    Borowsky A; Shinar D; Parmet Y
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 18516830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effects of Animation on the Guessability of Universal Healthcare Symbols for Middle-Aged and Older Adults.
    Chen H; Liu C; Hsu SE; Huang DH; Liu CY; Chiou WK
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1740-1758. PubMed ID: 34969321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of the effectiveness of traffic sign training in terms of training methods and sign characteristics.
    Ng AW; Chan AH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Jun; 12(3):283-95. PubMed ID: 21660896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expert evaluation of traffic signs: conventional vs. alternative designs.
    Ben-Bassat T; Shinar D; Almqvist R; Caird JK; Dewar RE; Lehtonen E; Salmon PM; Sinclair M; Summala H; Zakowska L; Liberman G
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jun; 62(6):734-747. PubMed ID: 30644336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the effects of bilingual traffic signs on driver performance and safety.
    Jamson SL; Tate FN; Jamson AH
    Ergonomics; 2005 Dec; 48(15):1734-48. PubMed ID: 16373314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ergonomic guidelines for traffic sign design increase sign comprehension.
    Ben-Bassat T; Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(1):182-95. PubMed ID: 16696267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A driving-emulation task to study the integration of goals with obligatory and prohibitory traffic signs.
    Roca J; Castro C; Bueno M; Moreno-Ríos S
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 21514565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Designing in-vehicle signs for connected vehicle features: Does appropriateness guarantee comprehension?
    Payre W; Diels C
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():102-110. PubMed ID: 31280793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of distance information and number of warning signs on driving safety of young adults near road work zones in China.
    Yang Y; Liu X; Easa SM; Feng Y; Zheng X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107230. PubMed ID: 37556999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and cognitive evaluation of 6 dynamic lane departure warning symbols.
    Maddahi H; Pouyakian M; Tabatabai Ghomsheh F; Piri L; Osqueizadeh R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Nov; 17(8):842-7. PubMed ID: 26902543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.