235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30626331)
1. Prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic cancer.
Bor R; Vasas B; Fábián A; Bálint A; Farkas K; Milassin Á; Czakó L; Rutka M; Molnár T; Szűcs M; Tiszlavicz L; Kaizer L; Hamar S; Szepes Z
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30626331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles.
Chen JY; Ding QY; Lv Y; Guo W; Zhi FC; Liu SD; Cheng TM
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8790-8797. PubMed ID: 27818594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study.
Kin T; Katanuma A; Yane K; Takahashi K; Osanai M; Takaki R; Matsumoto K; Gon K; Matsumori T; Tomonari A; Maguchi H; Shinohara T; Nojima M
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 25732902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Slow-pull technique yields better quality smears: prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
Bor R; Vasas B; Fábián A; Szűcs M; Füredi Á; Czakó L; Rutka M; Farkas K; Molnár T; Milassin Á; Bálint A; Szántó K; Hamar S; Kaizer L; Tiszlavicz L; Szepes Z
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Nov; 55(11):1369-1376. PubMed ID: 33016159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Slow-Pull Using a Fanning Technique Is More Useful Than the Standard Suction Technique in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses.
Lee JM; Lee HS; Hyun JJ; Lee JM; Yoo IK; Kim SH; Choi HS; Kim ES; Keum B; Seo YS; Jeen YT; Chun HJ; Um SH; Kim CD
Gut Liver; 2018 May; 12(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29409303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suction versus slow-pull for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic tumors: a prospective randomized trial.
Cheng S; Brunaldi VO; Minata MK; Chacon DA; da Silveira EB; de Moura DT; Dos Santos ME; Matuguma SE; Chaves DM; França RF; Jacomo AL; Artifon E
HPB (Oxford); 2020 May; 22(5):779-786. PubMed ID: 31677985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses.
Lee JK; Choi JH; Lee KH; Kim KM; Shin JU; Lee JK; Lee KT; Jang KT
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 May; 77(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 23433878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pretest prediction and diagnosis of metastatic lesions to the pancreas by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.
Krishna SG; Bhattacharya A; Ross WA; Ladha H; Porter K; Bhutani MS; Lee JH
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1552-60. PubMed ID: 25867963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The slow-pull capillary technique increases the quality of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy samples in solid pancreatic lesions.
El Haddad R; Barret M; Beuvon F; Grabar S; Leblanc S; Terris B; Coriat R; Chaussade S; Prat F
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Aug; 28(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 27140228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy using a 22-gauge needle with side fenestration in pancreatic cystic lesions.
Barresi L; Tarantino I; Traina M; Granata A; Curcio G; Azzopardi N; Baccarini P; Liotta R; Fornelli A; Maimone A; Jovine E; Cennamo V; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Jan; 46(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 23916241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization classification.
Unno J; Kanno A; Masamune A; Kasajima A; Fujishima F; Ishida K; Hamada S; Kume K; Kikuta K; Hirota M; Motoi F; Unno M; Shimosegawa T
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):1367-74. PubMed ID: 25180490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Wani S; Mullady D; Early DS; Rastogi A; Collins B; Wang JF; Marshall C; Sams SB; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Ulusarac O; Brauer B; Attwell A; Gaddam S; Hollander TG; Hosford L; Johnson S; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Kohlmeier C; Azar RR; Vargo J; Fukami N; Shah RJ; Das A; Edmundowicz SA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 110(10):1429-39. PubMed ID: 26346868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of 3 fine-needle biopsy techniques for suspected pancreatic malignancies in the absence of an on-site cytopathologist.
Lee KY; Cho HD; Hwangbo Y; Yang JK; Han SJ; Choi HJ; Lee YN; Cha SW; Moon JH; Cho YD; Park SH; Lee TH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Apr; 89(4):825-831.e1. PubMed ID: 30403966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
