559 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30627022)
21. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Repeat Screening Outcomes with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthetic Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: Results from the Prospective Verona Pilot Study.
Caumo F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Brunelli S; Bricolo P; Cugola L; Gennaro G
Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 33170101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification.
Li X; Qin G; He Q; Sun L; Zeng H; He Z; Chen W; Zhen X; Zhou L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):778-788. PubMed ID: 31691121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of radiation doses between diagnostic full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a clinical study.
Asbeutah AM; AlMajran AA; Brindhaban A; Asbeutah SA
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 67(3):185-192. PubMed ID: 32495513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective Trial.
Sumkin JH; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Catullo VJ; Zuley ML; Shinde DD; Hakim CM; Bandos AI; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1477-82. PubMed ID: 26391857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic value of the stand-alone synthetic image in digital breast tomosynthesis examinations.
Garayoa J; Chevalier M; Castillo M; Mahillo-Fernández I; Amallal El Ouahabi N; Estrada C; Tejerina A; Benitez O; Valverde J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):565-572. PubMed ID: 28812190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography and full-field digital mammography alone or in combination with digital breast tomosynthesis.
You C; Zhang Y; Gu Y; Xiao Q; Liu G; Shen X; Yang W; Peng W
Breast Cancer; 2020 Jan; 27(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 31302894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Sebuødegård S; Bandos AI; Gur D; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Hofvind S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jun; 169(3):489-496. PubMed ID: 29429017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Outcomes for One-View Asymmetries Recalled From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening Examinations.
Gong AJ; Nguyen DL; Lee EE; Mullen LA; Myers KS; Oluyemi E; Ambinder EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):724-733. PubMed ID: 35703412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of extent of breast cancer: comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography.
Mun HS; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Ruppel PL; Oh HY; Chae EY
Clin Radiol; 2013 Dec; 68(12):1254-9. PubMed ID: 23969151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detectability comparison of modes in dual-mode digital breast tomosynthesis.
Endo T; Morita T; Oiwa M; Suda N; Sato Y; Ichihara S; Shiraiwa M; Yoshikawa K; Horiba T; Ogawa H; Hayashi Y; Sendai T; Arai T
Breast Cancer; 2017 May; 24(3):442-450. PubMed ID: 27585694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of breast cancers.
Choi WJ; Kim HH; Lee SY; Chae EY; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Son BH; Ahn SH; Choi YW
Breast Cancer; 2016 Nov; 23(6):886-892. PubMed ID: 26534858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Value of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the diagnosis of breast lesions].
Yang L; Li J; Zhou CW
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 39(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 28104031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography for breast cancer screening focused on cancer characteristics: a meta-analysis.
Yun SJ; Ryu CW; Rhee SJ; Ryu JK; Oh JY
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):557-569. PubMed ID: 28516226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Value of Additional Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Preoperative Staging of Breast Cancer in Dense Breasts.
Krammer J; Stepniewski K; Kaiser CG; Brade J; Riffel P; Schoenberg SO; Wasser K
Anticancer Res; 2017 Sep; 37(9):5255-5261. PubMed ID: 28870962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Significance and Application of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the BI-RADS Classification of Breast Cancer.
Cai SQ; Yan JX; Chen QS; Huang ML; Cai DL
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):4109-14. PubMed ID: 25987095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.
Sharma N; McMahon M; Haigh I; Chen Y; Dall BJG
Radiology; 2019 May; 291(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 30888932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
